Literature DB >> 1820251

The Carcinogenic Potency Database: analyses of 4000 chronic animal cancer experiments published in the general literature and by the U.S. National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program.

L S Gold1, T H Slone, N B Manley, G B Garfinkel, E S Hudes, L Rohrbach, B N Ames.   

Abstract

The Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB) is an easily accessible, standardized resource of positive and negative long-term animal cancer tests. The CPDB has been published in four earlier papers that include results for approximately 4000 experiments on 1050 chemicals. This paper describes the CPDB: goals, inclusion criteria, fields of information, and published plot format. It also presents an overview of our published papers using the CPDB. The CPDB as published in plot format readily permits comparisons of carcinogenic potency and many other aspects of cancer tests, including for each experiment the species and strain of test animals, the route and duration of compound administration, dose level and other aspects of experimental protocol, histopathology and tumor incidence, TD50 (carcinogenic potency) and its statistical significance, dose response, author's opinion about carcinogenicity, and literature citation. A combined plot of all results from the four separate papers, which is ordered alphabetically by chemical, is available from L. S. Gold, in printed form or on computer tape or diskette. A computer readable (SAS) database is also available. The overview of papers includes descriptions of work on methods of estimating carcinogenic potency, reproducibility of results in near-replicate cancer tests, correlation in potency between species, ranking possible carcinogenic hazards, comparison of positivity and target organ in rats and mice, comparison of mutagens and nonmutagens, proportion of chemicals positive in animal tests, natural compared to synthetic chemicals, and mechanistic issues in interspecies extrapolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1820251      PMCID: PMC1568255          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.919611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  27 in total

1.  In reply: carcinogenic risk estimation.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Risk assessment.

Authors:  E K Silbergeld
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Carcinogenicity of aflatoxins.

Authors:  L Stoloff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards.

Authors:  B N Ames; R Magaw; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Summary of carcinogenic potency and positivity for 492 rodent carcinogens in the carcinogenic potency database.

Authors:  L S Gold; T H Slone; L Bernstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Second chronological supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1984 and by the National Toxicology Program through May 1986.

Authors:  L S Gold; T H Slone; G M Backman; R Magaw; M Da Costa; P Lopipero; M Blumenthal; B N Ames
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Chronological supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1982.

Authors:  L S Gold; M de Veciana; G M Backman; R Magaw; P Lopipero; M Smith; M Blumenthal; R Levinson; L Bernstein; B N Ames
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Third chronological supplement to the carcinogenic potency database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1986 and by the National Toxicology Program through June 1987.

Authors:  L S Gold; T H Slone; G M Backman; S Eisenberg; M Da Costa; M Wong; N B Manley; L Rohrbach; B N Ames
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Interspecies extrapolation in carcinogenesis: prediction between rats and mice.

Authors:  L S Gold; L Bernstein; R Magaw; T H Slone
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  14 in total

1.  ANVAS: artificial neural variables adaptation system for descriptor selection.

Authors:  Paolo Mazzatorta; Marjan Vracko; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology.

Authors:  Ann M Richard; Ruili Huang; Suramya Waidyanatha; Paul Shinn; Bradley J Collins; Inthirany Thillainadarajah; Christopher M Grulke; Antony J Williams; Ryan R Lougee; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Mahmoud Shobair; Chihae Yang; James F Rathman; Adam Yasgar; Suzanne C Fitzpatrick; Anton Simeonov; Russell S Thomas; Kevin M Crofton; Richard S Paules; John R Bucher; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Developing Structure-Activity Relationships for N-Nitrosamine Activity.

Authors:  Kevin P Cross; David J Ponting
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  Accurate and interpretable computational modeling of chemical mutagenicity.

Authors:  James J Langham; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Perspectives on the chemical etiology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lillian S DeBruin; P David Josephy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Genetic toxicology in developing countries: comments and recommendations.

Authors:  J Ashby; W Anwar; W W Au; A Massoud; J M Gentile
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  The Genetic Activity Profile database.

Authors:  M D Waters; H F Stack; N E Garrett; M A Jackson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.

Authors:  J McCann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Aspects of database construction and interrogation of relevance to the accurate prediction of rodent carcinogenicity and mutagenicity.

Authors:  J Ashby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Use of cell viability assay data improves the prediction accuracy of conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship models of animal carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Ivan Rusyn; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.