Literature DB >> 2351123

Third chronological supplement to the carcinogenic potency database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1986 and by the National Toxicology Program through June 1987.

L S Gold1, T H Slone, G M Backman, S Eisenberg, M Da Costa, M Wong, N B Manley, L Rohrbach, B N Ames.   

Abstract

This paper is the third chronological supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database that first appeared in this journal in 1984. We report here results of carcinogenesis bioassays published in the general literature between January 1985 and December 1986, and in Technical Reports of the National Toxicology Program between June 1986 and June 1987. This supplement includes results of 337 long-term, chronic experiments of 121 compounds, and reports the same information about each experiment in the same plot format as the earlier papers, e.g., the species and strain of animal, the route and duration of compound administration, dose level, and other aspects of experimental protocol, histopathology, and tumor incidence, TD50 (carcinogenic potency) and its statistical significance, dose response, opinion of the author about carcinogenicity, and literature citation. The reader needs to refer to the 1984 publication for a guide to the plot of the database, a complete description of the numerical index of carcinogenic potency, and a discussion of the sources of data, the rationale for the inclusion of particular experiments and particular target sites, and the conventions adopted in summarizing the literature. The four plots of the database are to be used together as results published earlier are not repeated. In all, the four plots include results for approximately 4000 experiments on 1050 chemicals. Appendix 14 of this paper is an alphabetical index to all chemicals in the database and indicates which plot(s) each chemical appears in. A combined plot of all results from the four separate papers, that is ordered alphabetically by chemical, is available from the first author, in printed form or on computer tape or diskette.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2351123      PMCID: PMC1567635          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9084215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  16 in total

1.  Response: paleolithic diet, evolution, and carcinogens.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-12-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  In reply: carcinogenic risk estimation.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Risk assessment.

Authors:  E K Silbergeld
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards.

Authors:  B N Ames; R Magaw; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Some tautologous aspects of the comparison of carcinogenic potency in rats and mice.

Authors:  L Bernstein; L S Gold; B N Ames; M C Pike; D G Hoel
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1985-02

6.  Association between carcinogenic potency and tumor pathology in rodent carcinogenesis bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; J M Ward; L Bernstein; B Stern
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1986-05

7.  An empirical comparison of methods used to estimate carcinogenic potency in long-term animal bioassays: lifetable vs summary incidence data.

Authors:  L S Gold; L Bernstein; J Kaldor; G Backman; D Hoel
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1986-02

8.  Summary of carcinogenic potency and positivity for 492 rodent carcinogens in the carcinogenic potency database.

Authors:  L S Gold; T H Slone; L Bernstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Chronological supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1982.

Authors:  L S Gold; M de Veciana; G M Backman; R Magaw; P Lopipero; M Smith; M Blumenthal; R Levinson; L Bernstein; B N Ames
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Interspecies extrapolation in carcinogenesis: prediction between rats and mice.

Authors:  L S Gold; L Bernstein; R Magaw; T H Slone
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  15 in total

1.  Dietary pesticides (99.99% all natural).

Authors:  B N Ames; M Profet; L S Gold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Dietary carcinogens, environmental pollution, and cancer: some misconceptions.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1990

3.  Rodent carcinogens in human food: are they important?

Authors:  K E von Mühlendahl
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A dichotomy in the lipophilicity of natural estrogens, xenoestrogens, and phytoestrogens.

Authors:  A R Cunningham; G Klopman; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Structure-activity relationship models for rat carcinogenesis and assessing the role mutagens play in model predictivity.

Authors:  C A Carrasquer; K Batey; S Qamar; A R Cunningham; S L Cunningham
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Estimating the extent of the health hazard posed by high-production volume chemicals.

Authors:  A R Cunningham; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Sixth plot of the carcinogenic potency database: results of animal bioassays published in the General Literature 1989 to 1990 and by the National Toxicology Program 1990 to 1993.

Authors:  L S Gold; N B Manley; T H Slone; G B Garfinkel; B N Ames; L Rohrbach; B R Stern; K Chow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Prediction of the carcinogenicity of a second group of organic chemicals undergoing carcinogenicity testing.

Authors:  Y P Zhang; N Sussman; O T Macina; H S Rosenkranz; G Klopman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The fifth plot of the Carcinogenic Potency Database: results of animal bioassays published in the general literature through 1988 and by the National Toxicology Program through 1989.

Authors:  L S Gold; N B Manley; T H Slone; G B Garfinkel; L Rohrbach; B N Ames
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.