Literature DB >> 9799185

Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.

J McCann1.   

Abstract

This review provides a discussion of cancer risk assessment methodology pertinent to developing a strategy for extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF). Approaches taken for chemical agents or ionizing radiation in six key topic areas are briefly reviewed, and then those areas are examined from the perspective of EMF, identifying issues to be addressed in developing a risk assessment strategy. The following recommendations are offered: 1) risk assessment should be viewed as an iterative process that informs an overall judgment as to health risk and consists of a complex of related activities incorporating both positive and negative data, tumor and nontumor end points, and human and nonhuman sources of information; 2) a hazard identification resulting in a conclusion of weak or null effects, such as may be associated with EMF, will need to assign significant weight to animal cancer bioassays conducted under defined exposure conditions as well as to human epidemiologic studies; 3) a default factor to account for possible age differences in sensitivity to carcinogenesis should be included in an EMF risk assessment; 4) lack of evidence of dose response and the apparent lack of DNA reactivity of EMF suggest that a safety (or uncertainty) factor or margin of exposure type of risk characterization may be most appropriate; and 5) an EMF risk assessment should permit at least tentative conclusions to be reached as to the limits of carcinogenic risk from exposure to EMF, and should also define an efficient research agenda aimed at clarifying uncertainties appropriate to a more complete assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9799185      PMCID: PMC1533493          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.106-1533493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  143 in total

Review 1.  Risk assessment of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic chemicals.

Authors:  F R Johannsen
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  The evaluation of negative epidemiologic studies: the importance of all available evidence in risk characterization.

Authors:  P A Buffler
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Use of "time windows" to investigate lung cancer latency intervals at an Ontario steel plant.

Authors:  M M Finkelstein
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 4.  Too many rodent carcinogens: mitogenesis increases mutagenesis.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Interpretation of "negative" studies in occupational epidemiology.

Authors:  A Ahlbom; O Axelson; E S Støttrup Hansen; C Hogstedt; U J Jensen; J Olsen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  Analyses of combined mortality data on workers at the Hanford Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant.

Authors:  E S Gilbert; S A Fry; L D Wiggs; G L Voelz; D L Cragle; G R Petersen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Consideration of both genotoxic and nongenotoxic mechanisms in predicting carcinogenic potential.

Authors:  B E Butterworth
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  Cell proliferation in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S M Cohen; L B Ellwein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Correlation between carcinogenic potency of chemicals in animals and humans.

Authors:  B C Allen; K S Crump; A M Shipp
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Proliferative and genotoxic cellular effects in 2-acetylaminofluorene bladder and liver carcinogenesis: biological modeling of the ED01 study.

Authors:  S M Cohen; L B Ellwein
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.