Literature DB >> 18199913

A proposal of an open PET geometry.

Taiga Yamaya1, Taku Inaniwa, Shinichi Minohara, Eiji Yoshida, Naoko Inadama, Fumihiko Nishikido, Kengo Shibuya, Chih Fung Lam, Hideo Murayama.   

Abstract

The long patient port of a PET scanner tends to put stress on patients, especially patients with claustrophobia. It also prevents doctors and technicians from taking care of patients during scanning. In this paper, we proposed an 'open PET' geometry, which consists of two axially separated detector rings. A long and continuous field-of-view (FOV) including a 360 degrees opened gap between two detector rings can be imaged enabling a fully 3D image reconstruction of all the possible lines-of-response. The open PET will become practical if iterative image reconstruction methods are applied even though image reconstruction of the open PET is analytically an incomplete problem. First we implemented a 'masked' 3D ordered subset expectation maximization (OS-EM) in which the system matrix was obtained from a long 'gapless' scanner by applying a mask to detectors corresponding to the open space. Next, in order to evaluate imaging performance of the proposed open PET geometry, we simulated a dual HR+ scanner (ring diameter of D = 827 mm, axial length of W = 154 mm x 2) separated by a variable gap. The gap W was the maximum limit to have axially continuous FOV of 3W though the maximum diameter of FOV at the central slice was limited to D/2. Artifacts, observed on both sides of the open space when the gap exceeded W, were effectively reduced by inserting detectors partially into unnecessary open spaces. We also tested the open PET geometry using experimental data obtained by the jPET-D4. The jPET-D4 is a prototype brain scanner, which has 5 rings of 24 detector blocks. We simulated the open jPET-D4 with a gap of 66 mm by eliminating 1 block-ring from experimental data. Although some artifacts were seen at both ends of the opened gap, very similar images were obtained with and without the gap. The proposed open PET geometry is expected to lead to realization of in-beam PET, which is a method for an in situ monitoring of charged particle therapy, by letting the beams pass through the gap. The proposed open PET geometry will also allow simultaneous PET/CT measurements of the same PET FOV as the CT FOV, in contrast to the conventional PET/CT where each FOV is separated by several tens of centimeters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18199913     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/3/015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  System design of a small OpenPET prototype with 4-layer DOI detectors.

Authors:  Eiji Yoshida; Shoko Kinouchi; Hideaki Tashima; Fumihiko Nishikido; Naoko Inadama; Hideo Murayama; Taiga Yamaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  Imaging simulations of an "OpenPET" geometry with shifting detector rings.

Authors:  Taiga Yamaya; Taku Inaniwa; Shinichiro Mori; Takuji Furukawa; Shinichi Minohara; Eiji Yoshida; Fumihiko Nishikido; Kengo Shibuya; Naoko Inadama; Hideo Murayama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-09

3.  Feasibility study of near-infrared fluorescence tomography using a positron emission tomograph equipped with depth-of-interaction PET detectors.

Authors:  Hideaki Tashima; Takashi Obi; Taiga Yamaya; Hideo Murayama; Keishi Kitamura; Ichiro Oda; Masahiro Yamaguchi; Nagaaki Ohyama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2009-06-30

4.  Monte Carlo simulation of sensitivity and NECR of an entire-body PET scanner.

Authors:  Ismet Isnaini; Takashi Obi; Eiji Yoshida; Taiga Yamaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-12-24

5.  Using compressive sensing to recover images from PET scanners with partial detector rings.

Authors:  SeyyedMajid Valiollahzadeh; John W Clark; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Restoration of lost frequency in OpenPET imaging: comparison between the method of convex projections and the maximum likelihood expectation maximization method.

Authors:  Hideaki Tashima; Takayuki Katsunuma; Hiroyuki Kudo; Hideo Murayama; Takashi Obi; Mikio Suga; Taiga Yamaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-05-31

7.  Total Body PET: Why, How, What for?

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin R Pantel; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-03

8.  Design study of an in situ PET scanner for use in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  S Surti; W Zou; M E Daube-Witherspoon; J McDonough; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Investigation of optimization-based reconstruction with an image-total-variation constraint in PET.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Jinghan Ye; Buxin Chen; Amy E Perkins; Sean Rose; Emil Y Sidky; Chien-Min Kao; Dan Xia; Chi-Hua Tung; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Performance evaluation of a depth-of-interaction detector by use of position-sensitive PMT with a super-bialkali photocathode.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Hirano; Munetaka Nitta; Naoko Inadama; Fumihiko Nishikido; Eiji Yoshida; Hideo Murayama; Taiga Yamaya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.