Literature DB >> 24366757

Monte Carlo simulation of sensitivity and NECR of an entire-body PET scanner.

Ismet Isnaini1, Takashi Obi, Eiji Yoshida, Taiga Yamaya.   

Abstract

The current positron emission tomography (PET) design is aimed toward establishing an entire-body PET scanner. An entire-body PET scanner is a scanner whose axial field of view (FOV) covers the whole body of a patient, whereas whole-body PET scanner can be of any axial FOV length, but was designed for a whole-body scan. Despite its high production cost, an entire-body depth-of-interaction PET scanner offers many benefits, such as shorter and dynamic PET time acquisition, as well as higher sensitivity and count rate performance. This PET scanner may be cost-effective for clinical PET scanners with high scan throughput. In this work, we evaluated the sensitivity and count rate performance of a 2-m-long PET scanner with conventional data acquisition (DAQ) architecture, using Monte Carlo simulation, and we evaluated two ring diameters (60 and 80 cm) to reduce the scanner cost. From simulation of scanning with a 2-m axial FOV, the sensitivity for a 2-m-long PET scanner of 60 and 80-cm diameter is around 80 and 68 times higher, respectively, than that of the conventional PET scanner. In addition, for the 2-m-long PET scanner with 60-cm diameter, the peak noise equivalent count rate (NECR) was 843 kcps at 125 MBq, whereas the peak for the 80-cm diameter was 989 kcps at 200 MBq. This shows gains of 15.3 and 17.95, respectively, in comparison with that of the conventional PET scanner. The 2-m-long PET scanner with 60-cm ring diameter could not only reduce the number of detectors by 21 %, but also had a 17 % higher sensitivity compared to that with an 80-cm ring diameter. On the other hand, despite the higher sensitivity, the NECR of the 60-cm ring diameter was smaller than that of the 80-cm ring diameter. This results from the single data loss due to dead time, whereas grouping of axially stacked detectors was used in the conventional DAQ architecture. Parallelization of the DAQ architecture is therefore important for the 2-m-long PET scanner to achieve its optimal performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24366757     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-013-0253-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  3 in total

1.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Role and cost effectiveness of PET/CT in management of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Wasif Saif; Ifigenia Tzannou; Nektaria Makrilia; Kostas Syrigos
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2010-06

3.  A proposal of an open PET geometry.

Authors:  Taiga Yamaya; Taku Inaniwa; Shinichi Minohara; Eiji Yoshida; Naoko Inadama; Fumihiko Nishikido; Kengo Shibuya; Chih Fung Lam; Hideo Murayama
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Theoretical study of the benefit of long axial field-of-view PET on region of interest quantification.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Quantitative image reconstruction for total-body PET imaging using the 2-meter long EXPLORER scanner.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Jian Zhou; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Parallax error in long-axial field-of-view PET scanners-a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Joel S Karp; Matt Werner; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.609

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.