Literature DB >> 25494657

PET/CT-guided treatment planning for paediatric cancer patients: a simulation study of proton and conventional photon therapy.

J S Kornerup1, N P Brodin, T Björk-Eriksson, C Birk Christensen, A Kiil-Berthelsen, M C Aznar, C Hollensen, E Markova, P Munck Af Rosenschöld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of including fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in the planning of paediatric radiotherapy (RT).
METHODS: Target volumes were first delineated without and subsequently re-delineated with access to (18)F-FDG PET scan information, on duplicate CT sets. RT plans were generated for three-dimensional conformal photon RT (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). The results were evaluated by comparison of target volumes, target dose coverage parameters, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and estimated risk of secondary cancer (SC).
RESULTS: Considerable deviations between CT- and PET/CT-guided target volumes were seen in 3 out of the 11 patients studied. However, averaging over the whole cohort, CT or PET/CT guidance introduced no significant difference in the shape or size of the target volumes, target dose coverage, irradiated volumes, estimated NTCP or SC risk, neither for IMPT nor 3DCRT.
CONCLUSION: Our results imply that the inclusion of PET/CT scans in the RT planning process could have considerable impact for individual patients. There were no general trends of increasing or decreasing irradiated volumes, suggesting that the long-term morbidity of RT in childhood would on average remain largely unaffected. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: (18)F-FDG PET-based RT planning does not systematically change NTCP or SC risk for paediatric cancer patients compared with CT only. 3 out of 11 patients had a distinct change of target volumes when PET-guided planning was introduced. Dice and mismatch metrics are not sufficient to assess the consequences of target volume differences in the context of RT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25494657      PMCID: PMC4651191          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  63 in total

1.  The width of margins in radiotherapy treatment plans.

Authors:  A L McKenzie; M van Herk; B Mijnheer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  PET/CT for staging and follow-up of pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel K L Cheuk; Noah D Sabin; Moinul Hossain; Amy Wozniak; Mihir Naik; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew J Krasin; Barry L Shulkin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Biophysical analysis of the acute toxicity of radiotherapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma--a comparison between extended field and involved field radiotherapy based on the data of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

Authors:  Hans Theodor Eich; Uwe Haverkamp; Andreas Engert; Martin Kocher; Roman Skripnitchenko; Corinne Brillant; Susanne Sehlen; Eckhart Dühmke; Volker Diehl; Rolf-Peter Müller
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Potential reduction of the incidence of radiation-induced second cancers by using proton beams in the treatment of pediatric tumors.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Antony Lomax; Laura Cella; Uwe Schneider
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  [Whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT imaging diagnostics in oncology].

Authors:  G P Schmidt; A Haug; M F Reiser; C Rist
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Clinical evidence on PET-CT for radiation therapy planning in head and neck tumours.

Authors:  Esther G C Troost; Dominic A X Schinagl; Johan Bussink; Wim J G Oyen; Johannes H A M Kaanders
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 7.  Paediatric nasopharyngeal rhabdomyosarcoma: A case series and literature review.

Authors:  J N Healy; M F Borg
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.735

8.  Ocular late effects in childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Kimberly F Whelan; Kayla Stratton; Toana Kawashima; John W Waterbor; Robert P Castleberry; Marilyn Stovall; Charles A Sklar; Roger J Packer; Pauline Mitby; Candice L Aitken; Julie Blatt; Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma.

Authors:  W H St Clair; J A Adams; M Bues; B C Fullerton; Sean La Shell; H M Kooy; J S Loeffler; N J Tarbell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Assessment of organ-specific neutron equivalent doses in proton therapy using computational whole-body age-dependent voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Christina Zacharatou Jarlskog; Choonik Lee; Wesley E Bolch; X George Xu; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.