Literature DB >> 18199661

Evidence for a common mode of transcription factor interaction with chromatin as revealed by improved quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.

Florian Mueller1, Paul Wach, James G McNally.   

Abstract

How site-specific transcription factors scan the genome to locate their target sites is a fundamental question in gene regulation. The in vivo binding interactions of several different transcription factors with chromatin have been investigated recently using quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). These analyses have yielded significantly different estimates of both the binding rates and the number of predicted binding states of the respective transcription factors. We show here that these discrepancies are not due to fundamental differences among the site-specific transcription factors, but rather arise from errors in FRAP modeling. The two principal errors are a neglect of diffusion's role and an oversimplified approximation of the photobleach profile. Accounting for these errors by developing a revised FRAP protocol eliminates most of the previous discrepancies in the binding estimates for the three different transcription factors analyzed here. The new estimates predict that for each of the three transcription factors, approximately 75% of the molecules are freely diffusing within the nucleus, whereas the remainder is bound with an average residence time of approximately 2.5 s to a single type of chromatin binding site. Such consistent predictions for three different molecules suggest that many site-specific transcription factors may exhibit similar in vivo interactions with native chromatin.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18199661      PMCID: PMC2275703          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.123182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  28 in total

1.  Anomalous diffusion of fluorescent probes inside living cell nuclei investigated by spatially-resolved fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  M Wachsmuth; W Waldeck; J Langowski
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-05-12       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Using FRAP and mathematical modeling to determine the in vivo kinetics of nuclear proteins.

Authors:  Gustavo Carrero; Darin McDonald; Ellen Crawford; Gerda de Vries; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 3.  How to get from A to B: strategies for analysing protein motion on DNA.

Authors:  Stephen E Halford; Mark D Szczelkun
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Three-dimensional fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with the confocal scanning laser microscope.

Authors:  Kevin Braeckmans; Liesbeth Peeters; Niek N Sanders; Stefaan C De Smedt; Joseph Demeester
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Robert L Pego; Diana A Stavreva; James G McNally
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Global nature of dynamic protein-chromatin interactions in vivo: three-dimensional genome scanning and dynamic interaction networks of chromatin proteins.

Authors:  Robert D Phair; Paola Scaffidi; Cem Elbi; Jaromíra Vecerová; Anup Dey; Keiko Ozato; David T Brown; Gordon Hager; Michael Bustin; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Challenges and artifacts in quantitative photobleaching experiments.

Authors:  Matthias Weiss
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.215

8.  Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) methods for visualizing protein dynamics in living mammalian cell nuclei.

Authors:  Diana A Stavreva; James G McNally
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Role of three-dimensional bleach distribution in confocal and two-photon fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments.

Authors:  Davide Mazza; Francesca Cella; Giuseppe Vicidomini; Silke Krol; Alberto Diaspro
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 1.980

10.  Rapid glucocorticoid receptor exchange at a promoter is coupled to transcription and regulated by chaperones and proteasomes.

Authors:  Diana A Stavreva; Waltraud G Müller; Gordon L Hager; Carolyn L Smith; James G McNally
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  90 in total

1.  Minimizing the impact of photoswitching of fluorescent proteins on FRAP analysis.

Authors:  Florian Mueller; Tatsuya Morisaki; Davide Mazza; James G McNally
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  N- and C-terminal domains determine differential nucleosomal binding geometry and affinity of linker histone isotypes H1(0) and H1c.

Authors:  Payal Vyas; David T Brown
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Cross-validating FRAP and FCS to quantify the impact of photobleaching on in vivo binding estimates.

Authors:  Timothy J Stasevich; Florian Mueller; Ariel Michelman-Ribeiro; Tilman Rosales; Jay R Knutson; James G McNally
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP.

Authors:  Minchul Kang; Charles A Day; Emmanuele DiBenedetto; Anne K Kenworthy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Nuclear proteins: finding and binding target sites in chromatin.

Authors:  Martin E van Royen; Angelika Zotter; Shehu M Ibrahim; Bart Geverts; Adriaan B Houtsmuller
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Concentration dependence of lipopolymer self-diffusion in supported bilayer membranes.

Authors:  Huai-Ying Zhang; Reghan J Hill
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  Molecular diffusion and binding analyzed with FRAP.

Authors:  Malte Wachsmuth
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.356

8.  Convergence of chromatin binding estimates in live cells.

Authors:  Davide Mazza; Florian Mueller; Timothy J Stasevich; James G McNally
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Discontinuous movement of mRNP particles in nucleoplasmic regions devoid of chromatin.

Authors:  Jan Peter Siebrasse; Roman Veith; Akos Dobay; Heinrich Leonhardt; Bertil Daneholt; Ulrich Kubitscheck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Isochronal superpositioning in the equilibrium regime of superpressed propylene carbonate to ∼ 1.8 GPa: A study by diffusivity measurement of the fluorescent probe Coumarin 1.

Authors:  Marco Bonetti; Alizée Dubois
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 1.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.