Literature DB >> 15296491

Challenges and artifacts in quantitative photobleaching experiments.

Matthias Weiss1.   

Abstract

Confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is today the prevalent tool when studying the diffusional and kinetic properties of proteins in living cells. Obtaining quantitative data for diffusion coefficients via FRAP, however, is challenged by the fact that both bleaching and scanning take a finite time. Starting from an experimental case, it is shown by means of computer simulations that this intrinsic temporal limitation can lead to a gross underestimation of diffusion coefficients. Determining the binding kinetics of proteins to membranes with FRAP is further shown to be severely hampered by additional diffusional contributions, e.g. diffusion-limited binding. In some cases, the binding kinetics may even be masked entirely by diffusion. As current efforts to approach biological problems with biophysical models have to rely on experimentally determined model parameters, e.g. binding rates and diffusion constants, it is proposed that the accuracy in evaluating FRAP measurements can be improved by means of accompanying computer simulations.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15296491     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.00215.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Traffic        ISSN: 1398-9219            Impact factor:   6.215


  47 in total

1.  Protein mobilities and P-selectin storage in Weibel-Palade bodies.

Authors:  Nikolai I Kiskin; Nicola Hellen; Victor Babich; Lindsay Hewlett; Laura Knipe; Matthew J Hannah; Tom Carter
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP.

Authors:  Minchul Kang; Charles A Day; Emmanuele DiBenedetto; Anne K Kenworthy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  FRAP analysis of membrane-associated proteins: lateral diffusion and membrane-cytoplasmic exchange.

Authors:  Nathan W Goehring; Debanjan Chowdhury; Anthony A Hyman; Stephan W Grill
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Concentration dependence of lipopolymer self-diffusion in supported bilayer membranes.

Authors:  Huai-Ying Zhang; Reghan J Hill
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Multiscale diffusion in the mitotic Drosophila melanogaster syncytial blastoderm.

Authors:  Brian R Daniels; Richa Rikhy; Malte Renz; Terrence M Dobrowsky; Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Imaging molecular interactions in living cells.

Authors:  Richard N Day; Fred Schaufele
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-03-10

7.  Simulations of (an)isotropic diffusion on curved biological surfaces.

Authors:  Ivo F Sbalzarini; Arnold Hayer; Ari Helenius; Petros Koumoutsakos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Effects of organelle shape on fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.

Authors:  Ivo F Sbalzarini; Anna Mezzacasa; Ari Helenius; Petros Koumoutsakos
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Size-dependent diffusion of membrane inclusions.

Authors:  Gernot Guigas; Matthias Weiss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  The fluorescent protein palette: tools for cellular imaging.

Authors:  Richard N Day; Michael W Davidson
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 54.564

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.