Literature DB >> 18197052

Pre- and postnatal genetic testing by array-comparative genomic hybridization: genetic counseling perspectives.

Sandra Darilek1, Patricia Ward, Amber Pursley, Katie Plunkett, Patti Furman, Pilar Magoulas, Ankita Patel, Sau Wai Cheung, Christine M Eng.   

Abstract

Recently, a new genetic test has been developed that allows a more detailed examination of the genome when compared with a standard chromosome analysis. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH microarray; also known as chromosome microarray analysis) in effect, combines chromosome and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses allowing detection not only of aneuploidies, but also of all known microdeletion and microduplication disorders, including telomere rearrangements. Since 2004, this testing has been available in the Medical Genetics Laboratory at Baylor College of Medicine for postnatal evaluation and diagnosis of individuals with suspected genomic disorders. Subsequently, to assess the feasibility of offering CGH microarray for prenatal diagnosis, a prospective study was conducted on 98 pregnancies in a clinical setting comparing the results obtained from array CGH with those obtained from a standard karyotype. This was followed by the availability of prenatal testing on a clinical basis in 2005. To date, we have analyzed over 8000 cases referred to our clinical laboratory, including approximately 300 prenatal cases. With the clinical introduction of any new testing strategy, and particularly one focused on genetic disorders, issues of patient education, result interpretation, and genetic counseling must be anticipated and strategies adopted to allow the implementation of the testing with maximum benefit and minimum risk. In this article, we describe our experience with over 8000 clinical prenatal and postnatal cases of CGH microarray ordered by our clinical service or referred to the Baylor Medical Genetics Laboratory and describe the strategies used to optimize patient and provider education, facilitate clinical interpretation of results, and provide counseling for unique clinical circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18197052     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f1ddb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  22 in total

Review 1.  Genomics in mammalian cell culture bioprocessing.

Authors:  Diane M Wuest; Sarah W Harcum; Kelvin H Lee
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 14.227

2.  Now you can! Reality & Future Applications of array CGH in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Diana Postorivo; Anna Maria Nardone; Michela Biancolella; Alvaro Mesoraca; Giuseppe Novelli
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2009-04

3.  Predictive genetic testing in children: constitutional mismatch repair deficiency cancer predisposing syndrome.

Authors:  Zandrè Bruwer; Ursula Algar; Alvera Vorster; Karen Fieggen; Alan Davidson; Paul Goldberg; Helen Wainwright; Rajkumar Ramesar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Parents' perceptions of the usefulness of chromosomal microarray analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Marian Reiff; Ellen Giarelli; Barbara A Bernhardt; Ebony Easley; Nancy B Spinner; Pamela L Sankar; Surabhi Mulchandani
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  Prenatal testing for intellectual disability: misperceptions and reality with lessons from Down syndrome.

Authors:  Kruti Acharya
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2011

6.  The 'thousand-dollar genome': an ethical exploration.

Authors:  Wybo J Dondorp; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Unintended diagnosis of Von Hippel Lindau syndrome using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH): counseling challenges arising from unexpected information.

Authors:  Jennifer Hogan; A Turner; K Tucker; L Warwick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Parents' Experience with Pediatric Microarray: Transferrable Lessons in the Era of Genomic Counseling.

Authors:  R Z Hayeems; R Babul-Hirji; N Hoang; R Weksberg; C Shuman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Physicians' perspectives on the uncertainties and implications of chromosomal microarray testing of children and families.

Authors:  M Reiff; K Ross; S Mulchandani; K J Propert; R E Pyeritz; N B Spinner; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.