Literature DB >> 26259530

Parents' Experience with Pediatric Microarray: Transferrable Lessons in the Era of Genomic Counseling.

R Z Hayeems1,2,3, R Babul-Hirji4,5,6, N Hoang4,5, R Weksberg4,5,7,6, C Shuman4,8,5,6.   

Abstract

Advances in genome-based microarray and sequencing technologies hold tremendous promise for understanding, better-managing and/or preventing disease and disease-related risk. Chromosome microarray technology (array based comparative genomic hybridization [aCGH]) is widely utilized in pediatric care to inform diagnostic etiology and medical management. Less clear is how parents experience and perceive the value of this technology. This study explored parents' experiences with aCGH in the pediatric setting, focusing on how they make meaning of various types of test results. We conducted in-person or telephone-based semi-structured interviews with parents of 21 children who underwent aCGH testing in 2010. Transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically according to the principles of interpretive description. We learned that parents expect genomic tests to be of personal use; their experiences with aCGH results characterize this use as intrinsic in the test's ability to provide a much sought-after answer for their child's condition, and instrumental in its ability to guide care, access to services, and family planning. In addition, parents experience uncertainty regardless of whether aCGH results are of pathogenic, uncertain, or benign significance; this triggers frustration, fear, and hope. Findings reported herein better characterize the notion of personal utility and highlight the pervasive nature of uncertainty in the context of genomic testing. Empiric research that links pre-test counseling content and psychosocial outcomes is warranted to optimize patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microarray; Parental experience; Personal utility; Qualitative; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26259530     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9871-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  23 in total

1.  22q11 deletion syndrome - the meaning of a diagnosis. A qualitative study on parental perspectives.

Authors:  U Hallberg; S Oskarsdóttir; G Klingberg
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.508

2.  Adapting genetic counseling training to the genomic era: more an evolution than a revolution.

Authors:  Catherine Wicklund; Angela Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jehannine Austin; Alicia Semaka; George Hadjipavlou
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Patient expectations and attitudes towards specialist genetic eye services.

Authors:  E Clarke; R Combs; G Black; G Hall
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Lisa Wawak; Rachel Kasper; J Felipe García-España; Michael F Christman; Erynn S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Why do we need a diagnosis? A qualitative study of parents' experiences, coping and needs, when the newborn child is severely disabled.

Authors:  A H Graungaard; L Skov
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.508

Review 7.  Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready?

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Wylie Burke; Isaac Kohane; Sharon E Plon; Ron Zimmern
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Parental perceived value of a diagnosis for intellectual disability (ID): a qualitative comparison of families with and without a diagnosis for their child's ID.

Authors:  Nancy L Makela; Patricia H Birch; Jan M Friedman; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Receiving inconclusive genetic test results: an interpretive description of the BRCA1/2 experience.

Authors:  Christine Maheu; Sally Thorne
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  "What does it mean?": uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Marian Reiff; Barbara A Bernhardt; Surabhi Mulchandani; Danielle Soucier; Diana Cornell; Reed E Pyeritz; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jennefer N Kohler; Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Ethical issues in pediatric genetic testing and screening.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.856

3.  Diagnostic exome sequencing in children: A survey of parental understanding, experience and psychological impact.

Authors:  J Wynn; R Ottman; J Duong; A L Wilson; P Ahimaz; J Martinez; R Rabin; E Rosen; R Webster; C Au; M T Cho; C Egan; E Guzman; M Primiano; J E Shaw; R Sisson; R L Klitzman; P S Appelbaum; U Lichter-Konecki; K Anyane-Yeboa; A Iglesias; W K Chung
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  An ethical analysis of divergent clinical approaches to the application of genetic testing for autism and schizophrenia.

Authors:  E Morris; M O'Donovan; A Virani; J Austin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Genetic Testing Experiences Among Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the United States.

Authors:  Shixi Zhao; Wei-Ju Chen; Shweta U Dhar; Tanya N Eble; Oi-Man Kwok; Lei-Shih Chen
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-12

Review 6.  Long overdue: including adults with brain disorders in precision health initiatives.

Authors:  Brenda M Finucane; Scott M Myers; Christa L Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Hope versus reality: Parent expectations of genomic testing.

Authors:  Katherine E Donohue; Siobhan M Dolan; Dana Watnick; Katie M Gallagher; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Nehama Teitelman; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-01-29

8.  Genetic tests by next-generation sequencing in children with developmental delay and/or intellectual disability.

Authors:  Ji Yoon Han; In Goo Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Pediatr       Date:  2019-11-04

9.  Genome-Wide Sequencing for Unexplained Developmental Disabilities or Multiple Congenital Anomalies: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 10.  Current evidence-based recommendations on investigating children with global developmental delay.

Authors:  Renuka Mithyantha; Rachel Kneen; Emma McCann; Melissa Gladstone
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.