Literature DB >> 23211699

Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Francesco Fiorentino1, Stefania Napoletano, Fiorina Caiazzo, Mariateresa Sessa, Sara Bono, Letizia Spizzichino, Anthony Gordon, Andrea Nuccitelli, Giuseppe Rizzo, Marina Baldi.   

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to explore the utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in groups of pregnancies with a priori low risk for detection of submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities, usually not considered an indication for testing, in order to assess whether CMA improves the detection rate of prenatal chromosomal aberrations. A total of 3000 prenatal samples were processed in parallel using both whole-genome CMA and conventional karyotyping. The indications for prenatal testing included: advanced maternal age, maternal serum screening test abnormality, abnormal ultrasound findings, known abnormal fetal karyotype, parental anxiety, family history of a genetic condition and cell culture failure. The use of CMA resulted in an increased detection rate regardless of the indication for analysis. This was evident in high risk groups (abnormal ultrasound findings and abnormal fetal karyotype), in which the percentage of detection was 5.8% (7/120), and also in low risk groups, such as advanced maternal age (6/1118, 0.5%), and parental anxiety (11/1674, 0.7%). A total of 24 (0.8%) fetal conditions would have remained undiagnosed if only a standard karyotype had been performed. Importantly, 17 (0.6%) of such findings would have otherwise been overlooked if CMA was offered only to high risk pregnancies.The results of this study suggest that more widespread CMA testing of fetuses would result in a higher detection of clinically relevant chromosome abnormalities, even in low risk pregnancies. Our findings provide substantial evidence for the introduction of CMA as a first-line diagnostic test for all pregnant women undergoing invasive prenatal testing, regardless of risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23211699      PMCID: PMC3722951          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  44 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting.

Authors:  Idit Maya; Bella Davidov; Liron Gershovitz; Yael Zalzstein; Ellen Taub; Justine Coppinger; Lisa G Shaffer; Mordechai Shohat
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation.

Authors:  Pawel Stankiewicz; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Fiorina Caiazzo; Stefania Napolitano; Letizia Spizzichino; Sara Bono; Mariateresa Sessa; Andrea Nuccitelli; Anil Biricik; Anthony Gordon; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Diagnostic genome profiling in mental retardation.

Authors:  Bert B A de Vries; Rolph Pfundt; Martijn Leisink; David A Koolen; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Irene M Janssen; Simon van Reijmersdal; Willy M Nillesen; Erik H L P G Huys; Nicole de Leeuw; Dominique Smeets; Erik A Sistermans; Ton Feuth; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Han G Brunner; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of Williams-Beuren syndrome in a father and son with haploinsufficiency for FKBP6.

Authors:  Kay Metcalfe; Emil Simeonov; William Beckett; Dian Donnai; May Tassabehji
Journal:  Clin Dysmorphol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.816

Review 6.  Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Amy Breman; Amber N Pursley; Patricia Hixson; Weimin Bi; Patricia Ward; Carlos A Bacino; Chad Shaw; James R Lupski; Arthur Beaudet; Ankita Patel; Sau W Cheung; Ignatia Van den Veyver
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Genetic counselling and ethical issues with chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal testing.

Authors:  George McGillivray; Jill A Rosenfeld; R J McKinlay Gardner; Lynn H Gillam
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the genomewide detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Lisenka E L M Vissers; Bert B A de Vries; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Irene M Janssen; Ton Feuth; Chik On Choy; Huub Straatman; Walter van der Vliet; Erik H L P G Huys; Anke van Rijk; Dominique Smeets; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Nine V Knoers; Ineke van der Burgt; Pieter J de Jong; Han G Brunner; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Trilochan Sahoo; Sau Wai Cheung; Patricia Ward; Sandra Darilek; Ankita Patel; Daniela del Gaudio; Sung Hae L Kang; Seema R Lalani; Jiangzhen Li; Sallie McAdoo; Audrey Burke; Chad A Shaw; Pawel Stankiewicz; A Craig Chinault; Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Benjamin B Roa; Arthur L Beaudet; Christine M Eng
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  25 in total

1.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Prenatal genetic testing with chromosomal microarray analysis identifies major risk variants for schizophrenia and other later-onset disorders.

Authors:  Gregory Costain; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Informed Decision-Making in the Context of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray.

Authors:  Jessica Baker; Cheryl Shuman; David Chitayat; Syed Wasim; Nan Okun; Johannes Keunen; Renee Hofstedter; Rachel Silver
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Application of whole exome sequencing in fetal cases with skeletal abnormalities.

Authors:  Juan Cao; An'er Chen; Liyun Tian; Lulu Yan; Haibo Li; Bihua Zhou
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-06

5.  Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Karin Em Diderich; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde Cp Govaerts; Jeroen Knijnenburg; Femke At de Vries; Marjan Boter; Debora Lont; Maarten Fcm Knapen; Merel C de Wit; Attie Tji Go; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Detection of copy number variants using chromosomal microarray analysis for the prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects with normal karyotype.

Authors:  Tingting Song; Shanning Wan; Yu Li; Ying Xu; Yinghui Dang; Yunyun Zheng; Chunyan Li; Jiao Zheng; Biliang Chen; Jianfang Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Perspective on the technical challenges involved in the implementation of array-CGH in prenatal diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Jonathan L A Callaway; Shuwen Huang; Evangelia Karampetsou; John A Crolla
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.695

8.  Utility of noninvasive genome-wide screening: a prospective cohort of obstetric patients undergoing diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Stephanie Guseh; Louise Wilkins-Haug; Anjali Kaimal; Lisa Dunn-Albanese; Sophie Adams; Sarah Carroll; Marie Discenza; Lori Dobson; Marney Brillinger; Judith Foster; Samantha Gbur; Hayley Green; Nancy Herrig; Chelsea Mandigo; Michelle Pacione; Penelope Roberts; Abigail Sassaman; Kathleen Steinberg; Courtney Studwell; Kathryn J Gray
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Delineating the 15q13.3 microdeletion phenotype: a case series and comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Chelsea Lowther; Gregory Costain; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Rebecca Melvin; Candice K Silversides; Danielle M Andrade; Joyce So; Hanna Faghfoury; Anath C Lionel; Christian R Marshall; Stephen W Scherer; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Microarray Technology for the Diagnosis of Fetal Chromosomal Aberrations: Which Platform Should We Use?

Authors:  Evangelia Karampetsou; Deborah Morrogh; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.