Literature DB >> 22989118

Physicians' perspectives on the uncertainties and implications of chromosomal microarray testing of children and families.

M Reiff1, K Ross, S Mulchandani, K J Propert, R E Pyeritz, N B Spinner, B A Bernhardt.   

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has improved the diagnostic rate of genomic disorders in pediatric populations, but can produce uncertain and unexpected findings. This article explores clinicians' perspectives and identifies challenges in effectively interpreting results and communicating with families about CMA. Responses to an online survey were obtained from 40 clinicians who had ordered CMA. Content included practice characteristics and perceptions, and queries about a hypothetical case involving uncertain and incidental findings. Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistical tests. Clinicians' comfort levels differed significantly for explaining uncertain, abnormal, and normal CMA results, with lowest levels for uncertain results. Despite clinical guidelines recommending informed consent, many clinicians did not consider it pertinent to discuss the potential for CMA to reveal information concerning biological parentage or predisposition to late-onset disease, in a hypothetical case. Many non-genetics professionals ordering CMA did not feel equipped to interpret the results for patients, and articulated needs for education and access to genetics professionals. This exploratory study highlights key challenges in the practice of genomic medicine, and identifies needs for education, disseminated practice guidelines, and access to genetics professionals, especially when dealing with uncertain or unexpected findings.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22989118      PMCID: PMC3527693          DOI: 10.1111/cge.12004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  46 in total

Review 1.  Whole genome scanning: resolving clinical diagnosis and management amidst complex data.

Authors:  Sarah E Ali-Khan; Abdallah S Daar; Cheryl Shuman; Peter N Ray; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Molecular technologies open new clinical genetic vistas.

Authors:  Laird Jackson; Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  The clinical context of copy number variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Charles Lee; Stephen W Scherer
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 5.600

4.  What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Robin Zoe Hayeems; Jessica Peace Bytautas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Chromosomal microarray interpretation: what is a child neurologist to do?

Authors:  Alex R Paciorkowski; Min Fang
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 7.  Genetic testing: considerations for pediatric nephrologists.

Authors:  Lisa M Guay-Woodford; Nine V A M Knoers
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.299

8.  What keeps you up at night? Genetics professionals' distressing experiences in patient care.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Rachel Silver; Cynda Hylton Rushton; Ellyn Micco; Gail Geller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Melanie Manning; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A blueprint for maternal and child health primary care physician education in medical genetics and genomic medicine: recommendations of the United States secretary for health and human services advisory committee on heritable disorders in newborns and children.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Tracy L Trotter; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; W Gregory Feero; R Rodney Howell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  20 in total

1.  Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Merryn V E Macville; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Three clinical experiences with SNP array results consistent with parental incest: a narrative with lessons learned.

Authors:  Benjamin M Helm; Katherine Langley; Brooke Spangler; Samantha Vergano
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Communicating microarray results of uncertain clinical significance in consultation summary letters and implications for practice.

Authors:  Jean Lillian Paul; Rachel Pope-Couston; Samantha Wake; Trent Burgess; Tiong Yang Tan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Parents' perceptions of the usefulness of chromosomal microarray analysis for children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Marian Reiff; Ellen Giarelli; Barbara A Bernhardt; Ebony Easley; Nancy B Spinner; Pamela L Sankar; Surabhi Mulchandani
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  A review of consent practices and perspectives for pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  A pilot eConsultation service in Eastern Ontario: bridging clinical genetics and primary care.

Authors:  Priya T Bhola; Clare Liddy; Amir Afkham; Erin Keely; Gail E Graham
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Are physicians prepared for whole genome sequencing? a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  K D Christensen; J L Vassy; L Jamal; L S Lehmann; M J Slashinski; D L Perry; J O Robinson; J Blumenthal-Barby; L Z Feuerman; M F Murray; R C Green; A L McGuire
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Advances in Genetic Discovery and Implications for Counseling of Patients and Families with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Jun Shen; Sharyn Lincoln; David T Miller
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2014-07-02

9.  A qualitative study of healthcare providers' perspectives on the implications of genome-wide testing in pediatric clinical practice.

Authors:  Marian Reiff; Rebecca Mueller; Surabhi Mulchandani; Nancy B Spinner; Reed E Pyeritz; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The disclosure of incidental genomic findings: an "ethically important moment" in pediatric research and practice.

Authors:  Martha Driessnack; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Nancy Downing; Alyson Hanish; Lisa L Shah; Mohammed Alasagheirin; Christian M Simon; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.