Literature DB >> 18196794

Image quality and localization accuracy in C-arm tomosynthesis-guided head and neck surgery.

G Bachar1, J H Siewerdsen, M J Daly, D A Jaffray, J C Irish.   

Abstract

The image quality and localization accuracy for C-arm tomosynthesis and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance of head and neck surgery were investigated. A continuum in image acquisition was explored, ranging from a single exposure (radiograph) to multiple projections acquired over a limited arc (tomosynthesis) to a full semicircular trajectory (CBCT). Experiments were performed using a prototype mobile C-arm modified to perform 3D image acquisition (a modified Siemens PowerMobil). The tradeoffs in image quality associated with the extent of the source-detector arc (theta(tot)), the number of projection views, and the total imaging dose were evaluated in phantom and cadaver studies. Surgical localization performance was evaluated using three cadaver heads imaged as a function of theta(tot). Six localization tasks were considered, ranging from high-contrast feature identification (e.g., tip of a K-wire pointer) to more challenging soft-tissue delineation (e.g., junction of the hard and soft palate). Five head and neck surgeons and one radiologist participated as observers. For each localization task, the 3D coordinates of landmarks pinpointed by each observer were analyzed as a function of theta(tot). For all tomosynthesis angles, image quality was highest in the coronal plane, whereas sagittal and axial planes exhibited a substantial decrease in spatial resolution associated with out-of-plane blur and distortion. Tasks involving complex, lower-contrast features demonstrated steeper degradation with smaller tomosynthetic arc. Localization accuracy in the coronal plane was correspondingly high, maintained to < 3 mm down to theta(tot) approximately 30 degrees, whereas sagittal and axial localization degraded rapidly below theta(tot) approximately 60 degrees. Similarly, localization precision was better than approximately 1 mm within the coronal plane, compared to approximately 2-3 mm out-of-plane for tomosynthesis angles below theta(tot) approximately 45 degrees. An overall 3D localization accuracy of approximately 2.5 mm was achieved with theta(tot) approximately 90 degrees for most tasks. The high in-plane spatial resolution, short scanning time, and low radiation dose characteristic of tomosynthesis may enable the surgeon to collect near real-time images throughout the procedure with minimal interference to surgical workflow. Therefore, tomosynthesis could provide a useful addition to the image-guided surgery arsenal, providing on-demand, high quality image updates, complemented by CBCT at critical milestones in the surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18196794     DOI: 10.1118/1.2799492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Tomosynthesis via Total Variation Minimization Reconstruction and Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing (PICCS) on a C-arm System.

Authors:  Brian Nett; Jie Tang; Shuai Leng; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2008-03-18

Review 2.  Tomosynthesis imaging: at a translational crossroads.

Authors:  James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.

Authors:  S Schafer; S Nithiananthan; D J Mirota; A Uneri; J W Stayman; W Zbijewski; C Schmidgunst; G Kleinszig; A J Khanna; J H Siewerdsena
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Extra-dimensional Demons: a method for incorporating missing tissue in deformable image registration.

Authors:  Sajendra Nithiananthan; Sebastian Schafer; Daniel J Mirota; J Webster Stayman; Wojciech Zbijewski; Douglas D Reh; Gary L Gallia; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Deformable image registration for cone-beam CT guided transoral robotic base-of-tongue surgery.

Authors:  S Reaungamornrat; W P Liu; A S Wang; Y Otake; S Nithiananthan; A Uneri; S Schafer; E Tryggestad; J Richmon; J M Sorger; J H Siewerdsen; R H Taylor
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Volume-of-change cone-beam CT for image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Junghoon Lee; J Webster Stayman; Yoshito Otake; Sebastian Schafer; Wojciech Zbijewski; A Jay Khanna; Jerry L Prince; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Intraoperative use of cone-beam computed tomography in a cadaveric ossified cochlea model.

Authors:  Emma Barker; Keith Trimble; Harley Chan; James Ramsden; Sajendra Nithiananthan; Adrian James; Gideon Bachar; Mike Daly; Jonathan Irish; Jeff Siewerdsen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Clinical evaluation of positioning verification using digital tomosynthesis and bony anatomy and soft tissues for prostate image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sua Yoo; Q Jackie Wu; Devon Godfrey; Hui Yan; Lei Ren; Shiva Das; William R Lee; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Integration of free-hand 3D ultrasound and mobile C-arm cone-beam CT: Feasibility and characterization for real-time guidance of needle insertion.

Authors:  E Marinetto; A Uneri; T De Silva; S Reaungamornrat; W Zbijewski; A Sisniega; S Vogt; G Kleinszig; J Pascau; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 7.422

10.  An electromagnetic "Tracker-in-Table" configuration for X-ray fluoroscopy and cone-beam CT-guided surgery.

Authors:  J Yoo; S Schafer; A Uneri; Y Otake; A J Khanna; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.421

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.