Literature DB >> 18196296

Trunk posture monitoring with inertial sensors.

Wai Yin Wong1, Man Sang Wong.   

Abstract

Measurement of human posture and movement is an important area of research in the bioengineering and rehabilitation fields. Various attempts have been initiated for different clinical application goals, such as diagnosis of pathological posture and movements, assessment of pre- and post-treatment efficacy and comparison of different treatment protocols. Image-based methods for measurements of human posture and movements have been developed, such as the radiography, photogrammetry, optoelectric technique and video analysis. However, it is found that these methods are complicated to set up, time-consuming to operate and could only be applied in laboratory environments. This study introduced a method of using a posture monitoring system in estimating the spinal curvature changes during trunk movements on the sagittal and coronal planes and providing trunk posture monitoring during daily activities. The system consisted of three sensor modules, each with one tri-axial accelerometer and three uni-axial gyroscopes orthogonally aligned, and a digital data acquisition and feedback system. The accuracy of this system was tested with a motion analysis system (Vicon 370) in calibration with experimental setup and in trunk posture measurement with nine human subjects, and the performance of the posture monitoring system during daily activities with two human subjects was reported. The averaged root mean squared differences between the measurements of the system and motion analysis system were found to be < 1.5 degrees in dynamic calibration, and < 3.1 degrees for the sagittal plane and < or = 2.1 degrees for the coronal plane in estimation of the trunk posture change during trunk movements. The measurements of the system and the motion analysis system was highly correlated (> 0.999 for dynamic calibration and > 0.829 for estimation of spinal curvature change in domain planes of movement during flexion and lateral bending). With the sensing modules located on the upper trunk, mid-trunk and the pelvic levels, the inclination of trunk segment and the change of spinal curvature in trunk movements could be estimated. The posture information of five subjects was recorded at 30 s intervals during daily activity over a period of 3 days and 2 h a day. The preliminary results demonstrated that the subjects could improve their posture when feedback signals were provided. The posture monitoring system could be used for the purpose of posture monitoring during daily activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18196296      PMCID: PMC2367407          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0586-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of two motion analysis devices used in the measurement of lumbar spinal mobility.

Authors:  A Mannion; M Troke
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Measuring spinal motion in rowers: the use of an electromagnetic device.

Authors:  A M Bull; A H McGregor
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Kinematics of rotational mobilisation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  R Y Lee
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  A real-time gyroscopic system for three-dimensional measurement of lumbar spine motion.

Authors:  Raymond Y W Lee; Judi Laprade; Eric H K Fung
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Compensation of magnetic disturbances improves inertial and magnetic sensing of human body segment orientation.

Authors:  Daniel Roetenberg; Henk J Luinge; Chris T M Baten; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Measurement of back and spinal mobility.

Authors:  M Pearcy
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Measurement of spinal posture and range of spinal movement.

Authors:  W Y Loebl
Journal:  Ann Phys Med       Date:  1967-08

8.  Spine-Straight device for the treatment of kyphosis.

Authors:  E Lou; J Raso; D Hill; N Durdle; M Moreau
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

9.  Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in the normal population.

Authors:  A H McGregor; I D McCarthy; S P Hughes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Dynamic back movement measured using a three-dimensional television system.

Authors:  M J Pearcy; J M Gill; M W Whittle; G R Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  32 in total

1.  A new approach to assess movements and isometric postures of spine and trunk at the workplace.

Authors:  Max Wunderlich; Thomas Rüther; Dieter Essfeld; Thomas C Erren; Claus Piekarski; Dieter Leyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Individual characteristics of reliable lumbar coupling motions.

Authors:  Woo-Suck Yun; Hyunho Kim; Ji Hoon Ahn; Young-Bae Park; Young-Jae Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The lumbar spine has an intrinsic shape specific to each individual that remains a characteristic throughout flexion and extension.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Judith R Meakin; Kay Cooper; Rebecca J Barr; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparative Analysis of Inertial Sensor to Optical Motion Capture System Performance in Push-Pull Exertion Postures.

Authors:  Sol Lim; Andrea Case; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet       Date:  2016-09-15

5.  Evaluation of spinal posture using Microsoft Kinect™: A preliminary case-study with 98 volunteers.

Authors:  A P G Castro; J D Pacheco; C Lourenço; S Queirós; A H J Moreira; N F Rodrigues; J L Vilaça
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2016-12-27

6.  Lower spinal postural variability during laptop-work in subjects with cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Accuracy and repeatability of an inertial measurement unit system for field-based occupational studies.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Nathan B Fethke; Howard Chen; Sakiko Oyama; David I Douphrate
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  Spinal postural variability relates to biopsychosocial variables in patients with cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Validity and reliability of innovative field measurements of tibial accelerations and spinal kinematics during cricket fast bowling.

Authors:  Billy Senington; Raymond Y Lee; Jonathan Mark Williams
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  The use of inertial sensors system for human motion analysis.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Alejandro Galán-Mercant; Jonathan M Williams
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2010-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.