Literature DB >> 8578393

Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in the normal population.

A H McGregor1, I D McCarthy, S P Hughes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The present study investigated the dynamic motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in the normal population using a potentiometric analysis system.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of a triaxial potentiometric analysis system to measure dynamic motion in the lumbar spine, and to use this system to form a database of dynamic motion characteristics from which normal parameters of motion and the factors affecting this motion could be defined. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal motion has been studied using a variety of different methods, the majority of which have been limited either in terms of reliability, accuracy, or invasiveness and many have been only of a static nature. There has been no previous study into the normal dynamic motion characteristics of the lumbar spine.
METHODS: The accuracy of the system was determined by a series of tests against a calibrated engineering mill, and the reliability of the system was assessed on 10 subjects with repeated measurements over a 3-day period. Values of range of motion and angular velocity were obtained from 203 normal subjects during flexion and extension, lateral flexion, and rotation.
RESULTS: The results of the calibration testing revealed excellent accuracy, and it was shown that the system was repeatable. Initial analysis of the results indicated that sex differences did exist with men having 58.4 degrees of flexion and women having 53.4 degrees. Age appeared to have an influence on motion, and a gradual reduction was seen with each decade (P < 0.001), with the 20-29-year age range having 59.5 degrees mean flexion, the 30-39-year group having 58.1 degrees, the 40-49-year group having 53.7 degrees, the 50-60-year group having 57.5 degrees, and the 60-70-year group having 45.9 degrees. Multiple regression techniques revealed that only a few factors are important with respect to motion and that these varied according to the characteristic being defined.
CONCLUSIONS: Range of motion tended to be affected by age and sex, whereas velocity was only affected by distance moved, with occupation and body mass index having little or no influence on the motion. The factors identified could only account for a small proportion of the variation seen, suggesting that it is difficult to predict the motion characteristics with any degree of sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8578393     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199511001-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Katrin Knecht; Gordana Balaban; Jiri Dvorak; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI.

Authors:  Falk Mörl; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Charge couple device-based system for 3-dimensional real time positioning on the assessment of segmental range of motion of lumbar spine.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Li-jun Chen; Jing Guan; Li Pan; Hui Ding; Hai-shu Ding
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.978

4.  Trunk posture monitoring with inertial sensors.

Authors:  Wai Yin Wong; Man Sang Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Degenerative lumbar intervertebral instability: what is it and how does imaging contribute?

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Victor N Cassar-Pullicino; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Quantitative assessment of the motion of the lumbar spine in the low back pain population and the effect of different spinal pathologies of this motion.

Authors:  A H McGregor; I D McCarthy; C J Doré; S P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Lumbar spondylolysis: a review.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Alessandro Cianfoni; Alfonso Cerase; Nicola Magarelli; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The analysis of segmental mobility with different lumbar radiographs in symptomatic patients with a spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Ellafi Mohamed; Daniel Koeppen; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Lumbar spine flexion and extension extremes of motion in women of different age and racial groups: the WIN Study.

Authors:  Elaine Trudelle-Jackson; Lisa Ann Fleisher; Nicole Borman; James R Morrow; Georita M Frierson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Kinematic and temporal interactions of the lumbar spine and hip during trunk extension in healthy male subjects.

Authors:  Stephan Milosavljevic; Poonam Pal; David Bain; Gillian Johnson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.