Literature DB >> 18196219

Patient function after a posterior stabilizing total knee arthroplasty: cam-post engagement and knee kinematics.

Jeremy F Suggs1, George R Hanson, Sang Eun Park, Angela L Moynihan, Guoan Li.   

Abstract

Even though posterior substituting total knee arthroplasty has been widely used in surgery, how the cam-post mechanism (posterior substituting mechanism) affects knee joint kinematics and function in patients is not known. The objective of the present study was to investigate posterior femoral translation, internal tibial rotation, tibiofemoral contact, and cam-post engagement of total knee arthroplasty patients during in vivo weight-bearing flexion. Twenty-four knees with a PS TKA were investigated while performing a single leg weight-bearing lunge from full extension to maximum flexion as images were recorded using a dual fluoroscopic system. The in vivo knee position at each targeted flexion angle was reproduced using 3D TKA models and the fluoroscopic images. The kinematics of the knee was measured from the series of the total knee arthroplasty models. The cam-post engagement was determined when the surface model of the femoral cam overlapped with that of the tibial post. The mean maximum flexion angle for all the subjects was 112.5 +/- 13.1 degrees . The mean flexion angle where cam-post engagement was observed was 91.1 +/- 10.9 degrees . The femur moved anteriorly from 0 degrees to 30 degrees and posteriorly through the rest of the flexion range. The internal tibial rotation increased approximately 6 degrees from full extension to 90 degrees of flexion and decreased slightly with further flexion. Both the medial and lateral contact point moved posteriorly from 0 degrees to 30 degrees , remained relatively constant from 30 degrees to 90 degrees , and then moved further posterior from 90 degrees to maximum flexion. The in vivo cam-post engagement corresponded to increased posterior translation and reduced internal tibial rotation at high flexion of the posterior substituting total knee arthroplasty. The initial cam-post engagement was also mildly correlated with the maximum flexion angle of the knee (R = 0.51, p = 0.019). A later cam-post engagement might indicate an environment conducive to greater flexion. If the factors that affect cam-post engagement timing can be established, proper manipulation of those factors may improve the function of the knee after posterior substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18196219     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0467-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  In vivo kinematics of total knee arthroplasty. Concave versus posterior-stabilised tibial joint surface.

Authors:  J Uvehammer; J Kärrholm; S Brandsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-05

2.  In vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics using a biplanar image-matching technique.

Authors:  T Asano; M Akagi; K Tanaka; J Tamura; T Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Andrea Baldini; Roberto Buzzi; Domenico Lup; Lapo De Luca
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Jun Yub Lee
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Comparing in vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Taka-aki Moro-oka; Marc Muenchinger; Jean-Pierre Canciani; Scott A Banks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Function of posterior cruciate ligament bundles during in vivo knee flexion.

Authors:  Ramprasad Papannagari; Louis E DeFrate; Kyung W Nha; Jeremy M Moses; Mohamed Moussa; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Influence of tibial component posterior slope on in vivo knee kinematics in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F Catani; S Fantozzi; A Ensini; A Leardini; D Moschella; S Giannini
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  S A Banks; G D Markovich; W A Hodge
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Range of motion in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Y S Anouchi; M McShane; F Kelly; J Elting; J Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  25 in total

1.  The effects of implantation of tibio-femoral components in hyperextension on kinematics of TKA.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Wang; Yu-Liang Liu; Kun-Jhih Lin; Tie-Bing Qu; Xiang Dong; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yong Hai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Less femorotibial rotation and AP translation in deep-dished total knee arthroplasty. An intraoperative kinematic study using navigation.

Authors:  Philippe Massin; Patrick Boyer; Marc Sabourin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Intraoperative evaluation of total knee replacement: kinematic assessment with a navigation system.

Authors:  Daniela Casino; Stefano Zaffagnini; Sandra Martelli; Nicola Lopomo; Simone Bignozzi; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Ligament tension in the ACL-deficient knee: assessment of medial and lateral gaps.

Authors:  David Mayman; Christopher Plaskos; Daniel Kendoff; G Wernecke; Andrew D Pearle; Richard Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  In vivo knee kinematics during high flexion after a posterior-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Angela L Moynihan; Kartik M Varadarajan; George R Hanson; Sang-Eun Park; Kyung Wook Nha; Jeremy F Suggs; Todd Johnson; Guoan Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  In vivo determination of cam-post engagement in fixed and mobile-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Sumesh M Zingde; Filip Leszko; Adrija Sharma; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  In vivo Kinematics of the Knee after a Posterior Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison between Caucasian and South Korean Patients.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Bae; Ali Hosseini; Kyung-Wook Nha; Sang-Eun Park; Tsung Yuan Tsai; Young-Min Kwon; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-01

8.  Comparisons of kinematics and range of motion in high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: cruciate retaining vs. substituting designs.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Ju-Kwon Park; Young-Joo Shin; Hyung-Yeon Seo; Keun-Bae Lee; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Different intraoperative kinematics with comparable clinical outcomes of ultracongruent and posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Woo Kim; Sang Min Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Sahnghoon Lee; Jak Jang; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Comparing navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics pre- and postoperatively between a cruciate-retaining and a cruciate-substituting implant.

Authors:  Clemens Baier; Hans-Robert Springorum; Jürgen Götz; Jens Schaumburger; Christian Lüring; Joachim Grifka; Johannes Beckmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.