Literature DB >> 18177834

Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage.

Karlijn Woensdregt1, Errol R Norwitz, Michael Cackovic, Michael J Paidas, Jessica L Illuzzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates whether 2 cerclage stitches are more effective than 1 stitch in the prevention of preterm birth. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of 150 singleton pregnancies that underwent cervical cerclage. Gestational age at delivery and clinical characteristics were compared.
RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients (74.7%) received 1 stitch, and 38 patients (25.3%) received 2 stitches. There were no baseline differences between the groups. Analysis showed no significant difference in gestational age at delivery between the 1 vs 2 cerclage groups overall (median, 38.0 vs 38.3 weeks of gestation, respectively; P = .356) or for a given gestational age cut-off (<37 weeks of gestation: 37.4% vs 34.2% [P = .727]; <34 weeks of gestation: 16.8% vs 18.4% [P = .823]; <28 weeks of gestation: 9.4% vs 2.6% [P = .179]).
CONCLUSION: This study shows no measurable benefit to the placement of 2 stitches over 1 stitch during cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies; however, further study of preterm birth at <28 weeks of gestation and postcerclage outcomes among a larger cohort is merited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18177834      PMCID: PMC2757008          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  11 in total

1.  Cervical incompetence: elective, emergent, or urgent cerclage.

Authors:  M Kurup; J W Goldkrand
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Elective cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Aravinthan Coomarasamy; Honest Honest; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  ACOG Practice Bulletin. Cervical insufficiency.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Andrew J Drakeley; Devender Roberts; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Cervical incompetence.

Authors:  B Shortle; R Jewelewicz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases.

Authors:  M C Treadwell; R A Bronsteen; S F Bottoms
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery.

Authors:  P Lazar; S Gueguen; J Dreyfus; R Renaud; G Pontonnier; E Papiernik
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1984-08

8.  Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: a reappraisal 25 years after its introduction.

Authors:  M J Novy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery.

Authors:  R W Rush; S Isaacs; K McPherson; L Jones; I Chalmers; A Grant
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1984-08

10.  Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Reducing the Risk of Preterm Birth by Ambulatory Risk Factor Management.

Authors:  Richard Berger; Werner Rath; Harald Abele; Yves Garnier; Ruben-J Kuon; Holger Maul
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Berghella; Jeff M Szychowski; John Owen; Gary Hankins; Jay D Iams; Jeanne S Sheffield; Annette Perez-Delboy; Deborah A Wing; Edwin R Guzman
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-05-14

3.  Viable extreme preterm birth and some neonatal outcomes in double cerclage versus traditional cerclage: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Farzaneh Broumand; Fatemeh Bahadori; Tahereh Behrouzilak; Zahra Yekta; Farkhondeh Ashrafi
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2011-09-13

4.  Influence of cervical cerclage interventions upon the incidence of neonatal death: a retrospective study comparing prophylactic versus rescue cerclages.

Authors:  A Wafi; G Faron; J Parra; L Gucciardo
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2018-03

5.  Role of Cervical Cerclage and Vaginal Progesterone in the Treatment of Cervical Incompetence with/without Preterm Birth History.

Authors:  Shao-Wei Wang; Lin-Lin Ma; Shuai Huang; Lin Liang; Jun-Rong Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.