Richard Berger1, Werner Rath, Harald Abele, Yves Garnier, Ruben-J Kuon, Holger Maul. 1. Marienhaus Klinikum St. Elisabeth, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Neuwied; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel; Tübingen University Hospital, Center for Women's Health, Tübingen; Klinikum Osnabrück GmbH, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Osnabrück; Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg; Asklepios Kliniken Barmbek, Wandsbek und Nord-Heidberg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hamburg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The preterm birth rate in Germany has remained unchanged at 8-9% since 2009. Preterm birth is the most common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. In the absence of a causal treatment, it is important to lower the risk of preterm birth by preventive measures in prenatal outpatient care. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications from the years 2000-2019 that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed. RESULTS: The clinical risk factors for preterm birth-known mainly from retrospective cohort studies-include previous preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.6), multiple pregnancy (relative risk [RR]: 7.7), nicotine consumption (aOR: 1.7), and a short uterine cervix, i.e., <25 mm in the second trimester (aOR: 6.9). In women with a short cervix, vaginally administered progesterone significantly lowers the preterm birth rate (22.5% vs. 14.1% for birth before 33 weeks of gestation, RR: 0.62; 95% confidence interval [0.47; 0.81]). Nicotine abstinence is associated with a lower pre- term birth rate as well (aOR: 0.91; [0.88; 0,.94]), while working more than 40 hours per week (aOR: 1.25; [1,.01; 1,.54]) and heavy lifting during pregnancy (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43; [1.13; 1.80]) are associated with a higher preterm birth rate. Avoidance of physical exertion, or bed rest, in the face of impending preterm birth does not lower the preterm birth rate, but it does increase the risk of complications, such as thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: The meticulous assessment and elimination of treatable risk factors at the outset of ambulatory prenatal care can help lower the preterm birth rate. Further velopment of causally directed treat- ments (e.g., changes of relevant environmental and epigenetic factors).
BACKGROUND: The preterm birth rate in Germany has remained unchanged at 8-9% since 2009. Preterm birth is the most common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. In the absence of a causal treatment, it is important to lower the risk of preterm birth by preventive measures in prenatal outpatient care. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications from the years 2000-2019 that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed. RESULTS: The clinical risk factors for preterm birth-known mainly from retrospective cohort studies-include previous preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.6), multiple pregnancy (relative risk [RR]: 7.7), nicotine consumption (aOR: 1.7), and a short uterine cervix, i.e., <25 mm in the second trimester (aOR: 6.9). In women with a short cervix, vaginally administered progesterone significantly lowers the preterm birth rate (22.5% vs. 14.1% for birth before 33 weeks of gestation, RR: 0.62; 95% confidence interval [0.47; 0.81]). Nicotine abstinence is associated with a lower pre- term birth rate as well (aOR: 0.91; [0.88; 0,.94]), while working more than 40 hours per week (aOR: 1.25; [1,.01; 1,.54]) and heavy lifting during pregnancy (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43; [1.13; 1.80]) are associated with a higher preterm birth rate. Avoidance of physical exertion, or bed rest, in the face of impending preterm birth does not lower the preterm birth rate, but it does increase the risk of complications, such as thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: The meticulous assessment and elimination of treatable risk factors at the outset of ambulatory prenatal care can help lower the preterm birth rate. Further velopment of causally directed treat- ments (e.g., changes of relevant environmental and epigenetic factors).
Authors: Cande V Ananth; Darios Getahun; Morgan R Peltier; Hamisu M Salihu; Anthony M Vintzileos Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: P J Meis; R Michielutte; T J Peters; H B Wells; R E Sands; E C Coles; K A Johns Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jennifer Hollowell; Laura Oakley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Peter Brocklehurst; Ron Gray Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Shao J Zhou; Karen Best; Robert Gibson; Andrew McPhee; Lisa Yelland; Julie Quinlivan; Maria Makrides Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: David M Ferrero; Jim Larson; Bo Jacobsson; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Jane E Norman; James N Martin; Mary D'Alton; Ernesto Castelazo; Chris P Howson; Verena Sengpiel; Matteo Bottai; Jonathan A Mayo; Gary M Shaw; Ivan Verdenik; Nataša Tul; Petr Velebil; Sarah Cairns-Smith; Hamid Rushwan; Sabaratnam Arulkumaran; Jennifer L Howse; Joe Leigh Simpson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roberto Romero; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Eduardo Da Fonseca; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; George W Creasy; Sonia S Hassan; Kypros H Nicolaides Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 8.661