Literature DB >> 8334085

Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists multicentre randomised trial of cervical cerclage. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether cervical cerclage in women deemed to be at increased risk of cervical incompetence prolongs pregnancy and thereby improves fetal and neonatal outcome.
DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Hospitals in the United Kingdom, France, Hungary, Norway, Italy, Belgium, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands and Canada.
SUBJECTS: One thousand two hundred and ninety-two pregnant women whose obstetricians were uncertain whether to recommend cervical cerclage, most of whom had a history of early delivery or cervical surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Cervical cerclage was compared with a policy of withholding the operation unless it was considered to be clearly indicated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delivery before 33 completed weeks, preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), and vital status of the baby after completion of the pregnancy.
RESULTS: The overall preterm delivery rate was 28%. There were fewer deliveries before 33 weeks in the cerclage group (83 (13%) compared with 110 (17%), P = 0.03) and this difference reflected deliveries characterised by features of cervical incompetence (painless cervical dilatation and prelabour rupture of the membranes). There was a corresponding difference in very low birthweight deliveries (63 (10%) compared with 86 (13%), P = 0.05). The difference in the overall rate of miscarriage, stillbirth or neonatal death (55 (9%) compared with 68 (11%)) was less marked and was not statistically significant. The use of cervical cerclage was associated with increased medical intervention and a doubling of the risk of puerperal pyrexia.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the operation had an important beneficial effect in 1 in 25 cases in the trial (95% confidence interval (CI) 1 in 12 to 1 in 300 sutures). Its use is associated with increased medical intervention and puerperal pyrexia. Nevertheless, this trial suggests that, on balance, cervical cerclage should be offered to women at high risk, such as those with a history of three or more pregnancies ending before 37 weeks gestation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8334085     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15300.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  40 in total

Review 1.  Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss in women.

Authors:  A J Drakeley; D Roberts; Z Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

2.  Successful pregnancy following mid-trimester evacuation through a transabdominal cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Manju Chandiramani; Lucy Chappell; Samara Radford; Andrew Shennan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-06-29

3.  Practices for predicting and preventing preterm birth in Ireland: a national survey.

Authors:  V Smith; D Devane; S Higgins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Injectable silk-based biomaterials for cervical tissue augmentation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Joseph E Brown; Benjamin P Partlow; Alison M Berman; Michael D House; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Jimmy Espinoza; Offer Erez; Sonia Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  The management of preterm labour.

Authors:  Jayanta Chatterjee; Joanna Gullam; Manu Vatish; Steve Thornton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 7.  Recurrent preterm birth.

Authors:  Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Beth L Pineles; Francesca Gotsch; Pooja Mittal; Nandor Gabor Than; Jimmy Espinoza; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Management of pregnancies with cervical shortening: a very short cervix is a very big problem.

Authors:  Hee Joong Lee; Tae Chul Park; Errol R Norwitz
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

9.  Cervical Conization and the Risk of Preterm Birth: A Population-Based Multicentric Trial of Turkish Cohort.

Authors:  Ali Galip Zebitay; Emre Sinan Güngör; Gülsah Ilhan; Orkun Çetin; Cem Dane; Canan Furtuna; Fatma Ferda Verit Atmaca; Merve Tuna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

10.  Evaluation of outcomes associated with placement of elective, urgent, and emergency cerclage.

Authors:  M J Khan; G Ali; G Al Tajir; H Sulieman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.