Literature DB >> 1892180

Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases.

M C Treadwell1, R A Bronsteen, S F Bottoms.   

Abstract

Charts from 482 singleton pregnancies undergoing cerclage placement in patients over a 6-year period were reviewed. Cervical dilatation at time of surgery, number of previous spontaneous losses, and gestational age at placement were key determinants of outcome. The most frequent complication, premature rupture of the membranes, ultimately occurred in 38% of patients. The 6.6% infection rate was increased in patients undergoing emergent versus elective surgery (12.7% vs 4.7%, p less than 0.005) and in patients at increased dilatation at time of surgery (5.7% for less than or equal to 2 cm vs 41.7% for greater than 2 cm, p less than 0.005). McDonald and Shirodkar procedures had similar obstetric outcomes in patients undergoing their first cerclage. The subgroup of patients with prior cerclage surgery showed improved birth weight when the Shirodkar procedure was performed instead of the McDonald cerclage (mean birth weight 3020 vs 2470 gm, p less than 0.005). An increased rate of primary cesarean section was found in the Shirodkar group (31% vs 17%, p less than 0.005). Complication rates and pregnancy outcome appear to reflect cervical dilatation more than gestational age at time of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1892180     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90283-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Detection of ureaplasmas by the polymerase chain reaction in the amniotic fluid of patients with cervical insufficiency.

Authors:  Kyung Joon Oh; Si Eun Lee; Hanna Jung; Gilja Kim; Roberto Romero; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.901

2.  Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Karlijn Woensdregt; Errol R Norwitz; Michael Cackovic; Michael J Paidas; Jessica L Illuzzi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis.

Authors:  Max Mönckeberg; Rafael Valdés; Juan P Kusanovic; Manuel Schepeler; Jyh K Nien; Emiliano Pertossi; Pablo Silva; Karla Silva; Pía Venegas; Ulises Guajardo; Roberto Romero; Sebastián E Illanes
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.716

4.  Effects of emergency cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective study of 158 cases.

Authors:  Li-Qiong Zhu; Hui Chen; Li-Bin Chen; Ying-Lin Liu; Jian-Ping Tian; Yun-Hui Wang; Rui Zhang; Jian-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-05-15

5.  A comparison of emergency and therapeutic modified Shirodkar cerclage: an analysis of 38 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Alper Başbuğ; Ozan Doğan
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-27

6.  Middle-East OBGYN Graduate Education (MOGGE) Foundation Practice Guidelines: Prelabor rupture of membranes; Practice guideline No. 01-O-19.

Authors:  Sherif A Shazly; Islam A Ahmed; Ahmad A Radwan; Ahmed Y Abd-Elkariem; Nermeen Bahaa El-Dien; Esraa Y Ragab; Mostafa H Abouzeid; Ahmed H Shams; Ahmed K Ali; Heba N Hemdan; Menna N Hemdan; Ahmed A Nassr; Faten F AbdelHafez; Nashwa A Eltaweel; Khaled Ghoniem; Ali M El Saman; Mohamed K Ali; Angela C Thompson
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.413

7.  A Novel Approach to Serial Amnioinfusion in a Case of Premature Rupture of Membranes Near the Limit of Viability.

Authors:  Katherine Kohari; Krista Mehlhaff; Audrey Merriam; Sonya Abdel-Razeq; Olga Grechukhina; Daisy Leon-Martinez; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2018-09-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.