Literature DB >> 2048610

Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: a reappraisal 25 years after its introduction.

M J Novy1.   

Abstract

Most cerclage operations for cervical insufficiency are performed transvaginally. The transabdominal route is beneficial in treating patients with cervices that are either extremely short, congenitally deformed, deeply lacerated, or markedly scarred because of previously failed transvaginal cerclage procedures. The average gestational age at surgery was 11.5 weeks and the operation was performed after early ultrasonographic verification of fetal viability. Patients with advanced cervical effacement or dilatation in the second trimester were excluded. A 5 mm wide Mersilene band was applied in an avascular space above the junction of the cervix and the uterine isthmus without dissection or tunneling among broad ligament vessels. This simplified surgical approach resulted in little operative blood loss (mean, 75 ml; range, 50 to 200 ml). After transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage, 21 pregnancies in 20 patients resulted in 18 term births, one premature birth with favorable outcome, and two early fetal deaths (90% salvage rate). A review of the world literature indicated 130 pregnancies with transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage during pregnancy and a cumulative success rate of 89%. Preconceptional transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage was reported in 30 pregnancies with an overall fetal survival rate of 81%. A survey of specialists in maternal-fetal medicine indicated an increasing interest and familiarity with transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage since its introduction more than two decades ago although this procedure is still not widely applied in obstetric practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2048610     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)91448-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  15 in total

1.  Transvaginal sonography and fiberoptic illumination of uterine vessels for abdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage.

Authors:  Olufemi Olatunbosun; Roger Turnell; Roger Pierson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Successful pregnancy following mid-trimester evacuation through a transabdominal cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Manju Chandiramani; Lucy Chappell; Samara Radford; Andrew Shennan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-06-29

Review 3.  Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Gulden Menderes; Lindsay Clark; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-30

4.  Laparoscopic placement of cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Olga A Tusheva; Sarah L Cohen; Thomas F McElrath; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

5.  Abdominal cerclage revisited.

Authors:  Devendra Arora; Navneet Magon; Manash Biswas; S Chopra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-01-18

6.  Cervicoisthmic cerclage: transabdominal vs transvaginal approach.

Authors:  Marili U Witt; Saju D Joy; Jennifer Clark; Amy Herring; Watson A Bowes; John M Thorp
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Karlijn Woensdregt; Errol R Norwitz; Michael Cackovic; Michael J Paidas; Jessica L Illuzzi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Laparoscopic removal of abdominal cerclage at 19 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  James F Carter; Ashlyn Savage; David E Soper
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage.

Authors:  James F Carter; David E Soper
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Laparoscopic removal of abdominal cerclage.

Authors:  James F Carter; David E Soper
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.