Literature DB >> 18162353

Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies.

Olaf Dietrich1, Maximilian F Reiser, Stefan O Schoenberg.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a field-strength of 3 T has become more and more frequently used in recent years. In an increasing number of radiological sites, 3-T MRI now starts to play the same role for clinical imaging that was occupied by 1.5-T systems in the past. Because of physical limitations related to the higher field strength and because of protocols transferred from 1.5-T MRI that are not yet fully optimized for 3 T, radiologists and technicians working at these systems are relatively often confronted with image artifacts related to 3-T MRI. The purpose of this review article is to present the most relevant artifacts that arise in 3-T MRI, to provide some physical background on the formation of artifacts, and to suggest strategies to reduce or avoid these artifacts. The discussed artifacts are classified and ordered according to the physical mechanism or property of the MRI system responsible for their occurrence: artifacts caused by B0 inhomogeneity and susceptibility effects, B1 inhomogeneity and wavelength effects, chemical-shift effects, blood flow and magnetohydrodynamics, and artifacts related to SNR.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18162353     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  62 in total

Review 1.  Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging.

Authors:  Michael E Moseley; Chunlei Liu; Sandra Rodriguez; Thomas Brosnan
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  Feasibility study of 3-T MR imaging of the skin.

Authors:  Sébastien Aubry; Céline Casile; Philippe Humbert; Jérome Jehl; Chrystelle Vidal; Bruno Kastler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A comparison of shimming techniques for optimizing fat suppression in MR mammography.

Authors:  Yasuo Takatsu; Kengo Nishiyama; Tosiaki Miyati; Hideto Miyano; Mariko Kajihara; Thai Akasaka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 4.  Low-Field Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Compelling Case for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance's Future.

Authors:  Orlando P Simonetti; Rizwan Ahmad
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Nanoparticle temperature estimation in combined ac and dc magnetic fields.

Authors:  Adam M Rauwerdink; Eric W Hansen; John B Weaver
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Small field of view imaging using wavelet encoding with 2 dimensional RF pulses and gradient echo: phantom results.

Authors:  Hacene Serrai; Richard Young
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Mieke M P Driessen; Johannes M P J Breur; Ricardo P J Budde; Joep W M van Oorschot; Roland R J van Kimmenade; Gertjan Tj Sieswerda; Folkert J Meijboom; Tim Leiner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-01-01

Review 8.  Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions.

Authors:  Susie Y Huang; Ravi T Seethamraju; Pritesh Patel; Peter F Hahn; John E Kirsch; Alexander R Guimaraes
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  2D phase-sensitive inversion recovery imaging to measure in vivo spinal cord gray and white matter areas in clinically feasible acquisition times.

Authors:  Nico Papinutto; Regina Schlaeger; Valentina Panara; Eduardo Caverzasi; Sinyeob Ahn; Kevin J Johnson; Alyssa H Zhu; William A Stern; Gerhard Laub; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Risk assessment of copper-containing contraceptives: the impact for women with implanted intrauterine devices during clinical MRI and CT examinations.

Authors:  Wiebke Neumann; Tanja Uhrig; Matthias Malzacher; Verena Kossmann; Lothar R Schad; Frank G Zoellner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.