Literature DB >> 30456586

Risk assessment of copper-containing contraceptives: the impact for women with implanted intrauterine devices during clinical MRI and CT examinations.

Wiebke Neumann1, Tanja Uhrig2, Matthias Malzacher2, Verena Kossmann2, Lothar R Schad2, Frank G Zoellner2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risks for implant users with copper-containing intrauterine devices (IUDs) during MR and CT examinations.
METHODS: A tissue-mimicking phantom suitable for all experiments within this study was developed. Seven different types of copper IUDs were evaluated. Heating and dislocation of each IUD were investigated at two clinically relevant positions in 1.5 T and 3 T MR scanners. Artifacts in the field of view caused by each tested IUD were determined for clinical MR and CT imaging.
RESULTS: No significant heating of any tested IUD was detected during MR measurements. The temperature increase was less than 0.6 K for all IUDs. Neither angular deflection nor translation of any IUD was detected. Artifacts in MR images were limited to the very vicinity of the IUDs except for one IUD containing a steel-visualizing element. Streaking artifacts in CT were severe (up to 75.5%) in the slices including the IUD.
CONCLUSION: No significant risk possibly harming the patient was determined during this phantom study, deeming MR examinations safe for women with an implanted copper IUD. Image quality was more impaired for CT than for MR imaging and needs careful consideration during diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • Risk assessment of copper-containing IUDs with regard to heating, dislocation, and artifacts during MR and CT imaging. • Neither significant heating nor dislocation was determined in MR; image quality was more impaired for CT than for MR imaging and needs careful consideration during diagnosis. • The tested IUDs pose no additional risks for implant users during MR and CT examinations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrauterine devices, copper; Magnetic resonance imaging; Patient safety; Phantoms, imaging; Tomography, X-ray computed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30456586     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5864-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  24 in total

1.  RF safety of wires in interventional MRI: using a safety index.

Authors:  Christopher J Yeung; Robert C Susil; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Composition of MRI phantom equivalent to human tissues.

Authors:  Hirokazu Kato; Masahiro Kuroda; Koichi Yoshimura; Atsushi Yoshida; Katsumi Hanamoto; Shoji Kawasaki; Koichi Shibuya; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  A review of magnetic resonance imaging compatible manipulators in surgery.

Authors:  H Elhawary; A Zivanovic; B Davies; M Lampérth
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients.

Authors:  I van der Schaaf; M van Leeuwen; A Vlassenbroek; B Velthuis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Lee; Sungjun Kim; Sung-Ah Lee; Ho-Taek Song; Yong-Min Huh; Dae-Hong Kim; Seung Hwan Han; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Artifacts in 3-T MRI: physical background and reduction strategies.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Spatial distribution of RF-induced E-fields and implant heating in MRI.

Authors:  Peter Nordbeck; Florian Fidler; Ingo Weiss; Marcus Warmuth; Michael T Friedrich; Philipp Ehses; Wolfgang Geistert; Oliver Ritter; Peter M Jakob; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Wolfgang R Bauer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

Authors:  Julia F Barrett; Nicholas Keat
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance elastography hardware design: a survey.

Authors:  Z T H Tse; H Janssen; A Hamed; M Ristic; I Young; M Lamperth
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  1 in total

1.  Case series demonstrating in vivo MR safety of stainless steel (Chinese/Ring) IUDs.

Authors:  Shailin Thomas; Nicole Hindman
Journal:  BJR Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.