Literature DB >> 26207581

Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions.

Susie Y Huang1, Ravi T Seethamraju1, Pritesh Patel1, Peter F Hahn1, John E Kirsch1, Alexander R Guimaraes1.   

Abstract

Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is challenging because of the complex interaction of multiple factors, including motion arising from respiration and bowel peristalsis, susceptibility effects secondary to bowel gas, and the need to cover a large field of view. The combination of these factors makes body MR imaging more prone to artifacts, compared with imaging of other anatomic regions. Understanding the basic MR physics underlying artifacts is crucial to recognizing the trade-offs involved in mitigating artifacts and improving image quality. Artifacts can be classified into three main groups: (a) artifacts related to magnetic field imperfections, including the static magnetic field, the radiofrequency (RF) field, and gradient fields; (b) artifacts related to motion; and (c) artifacts arising from methods used to sample the MR signal. Static magnetic field homogeneity is essential for many MR techniques, such as fat saturation and balanced steady-state free precession. Susceptibility effects become more pronounced at higher field strengths and can be ameliorated by using spin-echo sequences when possible, increasing the receiver bandwidth, and aligning the phase-encoding gradient with the strongest susceptibility gradients, among other strategies. Nonuniformities in the RF transmit field, including dielectric effects, can be minimized by applying dielectric pads or imaging at lower field strength. Motion artifacts can be overcome through respiratory synchronization, alternative k-space sampling schemes, and parallel imaging. Aliasing and truncation artifacts derive from limitations in digital sampling of the MR signal and can be rectified by adjusting the sampling parameters. Understanding the causes of artifacts and their possible solutions will enable practitioners of body MR imaging to meet the challenges of novel pulse sequence design, parallel imaging, and increasing field strength. (©)RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26207581      PMCID: PMC4613875          DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  24 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Transmit SENSE.

Authors:  Ulrich Katscher; Peter Börnert; Christoph Leussler; Johan S van den Brink
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo.

Authors:  T G Reese; O Heid; R M Weisskoff; V J Wedeen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques.

Authors:  Klaus Scheffler; Stefan Lehnhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Parallel excitation with an array of transmit coils.

Authors:  Yudong Zhu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide.

Authors:  James F Glockner; Houchun H Hu; David W Stanley; Lisa Angelos; Kevin King
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Adiabatic pulses.

Authors:  A Tannús; M Garwood
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Reducing motion artifacts in two-dimensional Fourier transform imaging.

Authors:  E M Haacke; J L Patrick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Gradient moment nulling in fast spin echo.

Authors:  R S Hinks; R T Constable
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artefacts in MR imaging.

Authors:  D R Bailes; D J Gilderdale; G M Bydder; A G Collins; D N Firmin
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  21 in total

1.  Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.

Authors:  Sima Ahmadian; Iraj Jabbari; Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Image-quality optimization and artifact reduction in fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fedel Machado-Rivas; Camilo Jaimes; John E Kirsch; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-11-30

3.  Large field of view distortion assessment in a low-field MR-linac.

Authors:  Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Joshua P Kim; Dongsu Du; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Quantitative analysis of fetal magnetic resonance phantoms and recommendations for an anthropomorphic motion phantom.

Authors:  Michael Shulman; Eunyoung Cho; Bipin Aasi; Jin Cheng; Saiee Nithiyanantham; Nicole Waddell; Dafna Sussman
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Influence of injection rate in determining the development of artifacts during the acquisition of dynamic arterial phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI studies.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Cesare Maino; Anna Pecorelli; Luca Riva; Giulia Querques; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Influence of dilution on arterial-phase artifacts and signal intensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

Authors:  Sarah Poetter-Lang; Gregor O Dovjak; Alina Messner; Raphael Ambros; Stephan H Polanec; Pascal A T Baltzer; Antonia Kristic; Alexander Herold; Jacqueline C Hodge; Michael Weber; Nina Bastati; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  Primer on Commonly Occurring MRI Artifacts and How to Overcome Them.

Authors:  Chikara Noda; Bharath Ambale Venkatesh; Jennifer D Wagner; Yoko Kato; Jason M Ortman; João A C Lima
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Foreign body mimicking neoplasia of the renal pelvis on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Charalampos Mamoulakis; Petros Gorgoraptis; Elias Kehagias; Apostolos Karantanas
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-19

9.  Applying MRI Intensity Normalization on Non-Bone Tissues to Facilitate Pseudo-CT Synthesis from MRI.

Authors:  Kuei-Yuan Hou; Hao-Yuan Lu; Ching-Ching Yang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30

10.  Intra-voxel incoherent motion MRI of the living human foetus: technique and test-retest repeatability.

Authors:  András Jakab; Ruth Tuura; Raimund Kottke; Christian J Kellenberger; Ianina Scheer
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2017-12-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.