Nico Papinutto1, Regina Schlaeger1,2, Valentina Panara3, Eduardo Caverzasi1, Sinyeob Ahn4, Kevin J Johnson4, Alyssa H Zhu1, William A Stern1, Gerhard Laub4, Stephen L Hauser1, Roland G Henry1,5,6. 1. Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 3. ITAB - Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University "G. D'Annunzio,", Chieti, Italy. 4. Siemens Healthcare USA, San Francisco, California, USA. 5. Bioengineering Graduate Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco and University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. 6. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present and assess a procedure for measurement of spinal cord total cross-sectional areas (TCA) and gray matter (GM) areas based on phase-sensitive inversion recovery imaging (PSIR). In vivo assessment of spinal cord GM and white matter (WM) could become pivotal to study various neurological diseases, but it is challenging because of insufficient GM/WM contrast provided by conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We acquired 2D PSIR images at 3T at each disc level of the spinal axis in 10 healthy subjects and measured TCA, cord diameters, WM and GM areas, and GM area/TCA ratios. Second, we investigated 32 healthy subjects at four selected levels (C2-C3, C3-C4, T8-T9, T9-T10, total acquisition time <8 min) and generated normative reference values of TCA and GM areas. We assessed test-retest, intra- and interoperator reliability of the acquisition strategy, and measurement steps. RESULTS: The measurement procedure based on 2D PSIR imaging allowed TCA and GM area assessments along the entire spinal cord axis. The tests we performed revealed high test-retest/intraoperator reliability (mean coefficient of variation [COV] at C2-C3: TCA = 0.41%, GM area = 2.75%) and interoperator reliability of the measurements (mean COV on the 4 levels: TCA = 0.44%, GM area = 4.20%; mean intraclass correlation coefficient: TCA = 0.998, GM area = 0.906). CONCLUSION: 2D PSIR allows reliable in vivo assessment of spinal cord TCA, GM, and WM areas in clinically feasible acquisition times. The area measurements presented here are in agreement with previous MRI and postmortem studies.
PURPOSE: To present and assess a procedure for measurement of spinal cord total cross-sectional areas (TCA) and gray matter (GM) areas based on phase-sensitive inversion recovery imaging (PSIR). In vivo assessment of spinal cord GM and white matter (WM) could become pivotal to study various neurological diseases, but it is challenging because of insufficient GM/WM contrast provided by conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We acquired 2D PSIR images at 3T at each disc level of the spinal axis in 10 healthy subjects and measured TCA, cord diameters, WM and GM areas, and GM area/TCA ratios. Second, we investigated 32 healthy subjects at four selected levels (C2-C3, C3-C4, T8-T9, T9-T10, total acquisition time <8 min) and generated normative reference values of TCA and GM areas. We assessed test-retest, intra- and interoperator reliability of the acquisition strategy, and measurement steps. RESULTS: The measurement procedure based on 2D PSIR imaging allowed TCA and GM area assessments along the entire spinal cord axis. The tests we performed revealed high test-retest/intraoperator reliability (mean coefficient of variation [COV] at C2-C3: TCA = 0.41%, GM area = 2.75%) and interoperator reliability of the measurements (mean COV on the 4 levels: TCA = 0.44%, GM area = 4.20%; mean intraclass correlation coefficient: TCA = 0.998, GM area = 0.906). CONCLUSION: 2D PSIR allows reliable in vivo assessment of spinal cord TCA, GM, and WM areas in clinically feasible acquisition times. The area measurements presented here are in agreement with previous MRI and postmortem studies.
Authors: Ruth L O'Gorman; Karin Shmueli; Keyoumars Ashkan; Michael Samuel; David J Lythgoe; Asal Shahidiani; Stephen J Wastling; Michelle Footman; Richard P Selway; Jozef Jarosz Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christopher P Gilmore; Gabriele C DeLuca; Lars Bö; Trudy Owens; James Lowe; Margaret M Esiri; Nikos Evangelou Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2008-12-19 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Paola Valsasina; Maria A Rocca; Federica Agosta; Beatrice Benedetti; Mark A Horsfield; Antonio Gallo; Marco Rovaris; Giancarlo Comi; Massimo Filippi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-03-31 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: C A Wheeler-Kingshott; P W Stroman; J M Schwab; M Bacon; R Bosma; J Brooks; D W Cadotte; T Carlstedt; O Ciccarelli; J Cohen-Adad; A Curt; N Evangelou; M G Fehlings; M Filippi; B J Kelley; S Kollias; A Mackay; C A Porro; S Smith; S M Strittmatter; P Summers; A J Thompson; I Tracey Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-07-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: J P Klein; A Arora; M Neema; B C Healy; S Tauhid; D Goldberg-Zimring; C Chavarro-Nieto; J M Stankiewicz; A B Cohen; G J Buckle; M K Houtchens; A Ceccarelli; E Dell'Oglio; C R G Guttmann; D C Alsop; D B Hackney; R Bakshi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Rohit Bakshi; Antje Bischof; Peter A Calabresi; Eduardo Caverzasi; R Todd Constable; Esha Datta; Gina Kirkish; Govind Nair; Jiwon Oh; Daniel Pelletier; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; William Rooney; Snehashis Roy; Daniel Schwartz; Russell T Shinohara; Nancy L Sicotte; William A Stern; Ian Tagge; Shahamat Tauhid; Subhash Tummala; Roland G Henry Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: C Tsagkas; A Horvath; A Altermatt; S Pezold; M Weigel; T Haas; M Amann; L Kappos; T Sprenger; O Bieri; P Cattin; K Parmar Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Valentina Panara; R Navarra; P A Mattei; E Piccirilli; V Bartoletti; A Uncini; M Caulo Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Riley Bove; Tanuja Chitnis; Bruce Ac Cree; Mar Tintoré; Yvonne Naegelin; Bernard Mj Uitdehaag; Ludwig Kappos; Samia J Khoury; Xavier Montalban; Stephen L Hauser; Howard L Weiner Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: V Panara; R Navarra; P A Mattei; E Piccirilli; A R Cotroneo; N Papinutto; R G Henry; A Uncini; M Caulo Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-07-04 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Carlo Asteggiano; Antje Bischof; Tristan J Gundel; Eduardo Caverzasi; William A Stern; Stefano Bastianello; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Regina Schlaeger; Nico Papinutto; Alyssa H Zhu; Iryna V Lobach; Carolyn J Bevan; Monica Bucci; Antonella Castellano; Jeffrey M Gelfand; Jennifer S Graves; Ari J Green; Kesshi M Jordan; Anisha Keshavan; Valentina Panara; William A Stern; H-Christian von Büdingen; Emmanuelle Waubant; Douglas S Goodin; Bruce A C Cree; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: K R Servelhere; R F Casseb; F D de Lima; T J R Rezende; L P Ramalho; M C França Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 3.825