Literature DB >> 18097716

Historical review of surgical simulation--a personal perspective.

Richard M Satava1.   

Abstract

Although simulation is relatively new to surgical education, there is a long history in many other disciplines, such as military, aviation, and nuclear power plant operations, among others. In the late 1980s these technologies began to be adapted to the surgical world, along with the new technology of virtual reality. This is a review of the introduction of manikins, computers, and virtual reality into education and training for surgical skills. Two concomitant revolutions occurred: objective assessment of surgical skills and converting training from the apprenticeship model to one of criterion-based training. A personal perspective on these developments adds information not previously published.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18097716     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9374-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

1.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.

Authors:  V Datta; S Mackay; M Mandalia; A Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The Blue DRAGON--a system for monitoring the kinematics and the dynamics of endoscopic tools in minimally invasive surgery for objective laparoscopic skill assessment.

Authors:  Jacob Rosen; Jeffrey D Brown; Marco Barreca; Lily Chang; Blake Hannaford; Mika Sinanan
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

4.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures.

Authors:  S L Delp; J P Loan; M G Hoy; F E Zajac; E L Topp; J M Rosen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Gaze-contingent control for minimally invasive robotic surgery.

Authors:  George P Mylonas; Ara Darzi; Guang Zhong Yang
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2006-09

6.  Virtual environments. Surgical simulation in otolaryngology.

Authors:  C V Edmond; G J Wiet; B Bolger
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents.

Authors:  J A Martin; G Regehr; R Reznick; H MacRae; J Murnaghan; C Hutchison; M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: re-creating the operating room for research and training.

Authors:  D M Gaba; A DeAnda
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology.

Authors:  Breno Dauster; Andrew P Steinberg; Melina C Vassiliou; Simon Bergman; Donna D Stanbridge; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.942

  10 in total
  31 in total

1.  Background-incorporated volumetric model for patient-specific surgical simulation: a segmentation-free, modeling-free framework.

Authors:  Kei Wai Cecilia Hung; Megumi Nakao; Koji Yoshimura; Kotaro Minato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Training otologic surgical skills through simulation-moving toward validation: a pilot study and lessons learned.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Jeff C Rastatter; Sumit Bapna; Mark Packer; Don Stredney; D Bradley Welling
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

3.  The effect of simulation in improving students' performance in laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Azzam S Al-Kadi; Tyrone Donnon; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci; Philip Mitchell; Estifanos Debru; Neal Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Review of available methods of simulation training to facilitate surgical education.

Authors:  Badma Bashankaev; Sergey Baido; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Pneumoperitoneum simulation based on mass-spring-damper models for laparoscopic surgical planning.

Authors:  Yukitaka Nimura; Jia Di Qu; Yuichiro Hayashi; Masahiro Oda; Takayuki Kitasaka; Makoto Hashizume; Kazunari Misawa; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-12-17

Review 6.  Simulation for competency assessment in vascular and cardiac ultrasound.

Authors:  Florence H Sheehan; R Eugene Zierler
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.239

7.  Comparing distance perception in different virtual environments.

Authors:  Chiara Saracini; Ronny Franke; Eberhard Blümel; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09

Review 8.  Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques.

Authors:  Ido Badash; Karen Burtt; Carlos A Solorzano; Joseph N Carey
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

9.  Development and validation of an artificial wetlab training system for the lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Jens Adermann; Norman Geissler; Luis E Bernal; Susanne Kotzsch; Werner Korb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future.

Authors:  B M A Schout; A J M Hendrikx; F Scheele; B L H Bemelmans; A J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.