Literature DB >> 20454866

Background-incorporated volumetric model for patient-specific surgical simulation: a segmentation-free, modeling-free framework.

Kei Wai Cecilia Hung1, Megumi Nakao, Koji Yoshimura, Kotaro Minato.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-specific surgical simulation imposes both practical and technical challenges. We propose a segmentation-free, modeling-free framework that creates medical volumetric models for intuitive volume deformation and manipulation in patient-specific surgical simulation.
METHODS: The proposed framework creates a volumetric model based upon a new form of mesh structure, a Volume Proxy Mesh (VPM). The model can be generated in two phases: the vertex placement phase and mesh improvement phase. Vertices of a VPM are assigned to an initial location by curvature-based vertex placement method, and followed by mesh improvement performed by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO).
RESULTS: The framework is applied to several kidney CT volume data. Using the framework, the resulting models are closely tailored to the detailed features of the datasets. Moreover, the resulting VPM meshes can support broader spectrum deformation between the manipulated organ and its surrounding tissues. Progress in the mesh quality of the final mesh also shows that PSO is feasible for mesh improvement.
CONCLUSION: The framework was applied to several kidney CT volume datasets. Using the framework, the resulting models are closely tailored to the detailed features of the datasets. Moreover, the resulting VPM meshes can support broader spectrum deformation between the manipulated organ and its surrounding tissues. Evaluation of final mesh quality shows that PSO is feasible for mesh improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20454866     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-010-0456-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  9 in total

1.  Volumetric object modeling for surgical simulation.

Authors:  S Gibson; C Fyock; E Grimson; T Kanade; R Kikinis; H Lauer; N McKenzie; A Mor; S Nakajima; H Ohkami; R Osborne; J Samosky; A Sawada
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery.

Authors:  R S Haluck; R L Marshall; T M Krummel; M G Melkonian
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications.

Authors:  Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Historical review of surgical simulation--a personal perspective.

Authors:  Richard M Satava
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Topology, accuracy, and quality of isosurface meshes using dynamic particles.

Authors:  Miriah Meyer; Robert M Kirby; Ross Whitaker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.579

6.  Patient-specific model of brain deformation: application to medical image registration.

Authors:  Adam Wittek; Karol Miller; Ron Kikinis; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome.

Authors:  Andre Plass; Hans Scheffel; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp Kaufmann; Michele Genoni; Volkmar Falk; Jürg Grünenfelder
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leanne M Sutherland; Philippa F Middleton; Adrian Anthony; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Patrick Cregan; David Scott; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Patient-specific surgical simulation.

Authors:  Luc Soler; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.