Literature DB >> 26697510

Pneumoperitoneum simulation based on mass-spring-damper models for laparoscopic surgical planning.

Yukitaka Nimura1, Jia Di Qu2, Yuichiro Hayashi1, Masahiro Oda2, Takayuki Kitasaka3, Makoto Hashizume4, Kazunari Misawa5, Kensaku Mori6.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery, which is one minimally invasive surgical technique that is now widely performed, is done by making a working space (pneumoperitoneum) by infusing carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) gas into the abdominal cavity. A virtual pneumoperitoneum method that simulates the abdominal wall and viscera motion by the pneumoperitoneum based on mass-spring-damper models (MSDMs) with mechanical properties is proposed. Our proposed method simulates the pneumoperitoneum based on MSDMs and Newton's equations of motion. The parameters of MSDMs are determined by the anatomical knowledge of the mechanical properties of human tissues. Virtual [Formula: see text] gas pressure is applied to the boundary surface of the abdominal cavity. The abdominal shapes after creation of the pneumoperitoneum are computed by solving the equations of motion. The mean position errors of our proposed method using 10 mmHg virtual gas pressure were [Formula: see text], and the position error of the previous method proposed by Kitasaka et al. was 35.6 mm. The differences in the errors were statistically significant ([Formula: see text], Student's [Formula: see text]-test). The position error of the proposed method was reduced from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] using 30 mmHg virtual gas pressure. The proposed method simulated abdominal wall motion by infused gas pressure and generated deformed volumetric images from a preoperative volumetric image. Our method predicted abdominal wall deformation by just giving the [Formula: see text] gas pressure and the tissue properties. Measurement of the visceral displacement will be required to validate the visceral motion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamics; mass-spring-damper models; pneumoperitoneum; surgical planning

Year:  2015        PMID: 26697510      PMCID: PMC4682385          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.044004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  26 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Madeleine M Keehner; Frank Tendick; Maxwell V Meng; Haroon P Anwar; Mary Hegarty; Marshall L Stoller; Quan-Yang Duh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Patient-specific simulation in carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Willem Willaert; Rajesh Aggarwal; Colin Bicknell; Mo Hamady; Ara Darzi; Frank Vermassen; Nicholas Cheshire
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Multi-organ segmentation based on spatially-divided probabilistic atlas from 3D abdominal CT images.

Authors:  Chengwen Chu; Masahiro Oda; Takayuki Kitasaka; Kazunari Misawa; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yuichiro Hayashi; Yukitaka Nimura; Daniel Rueckert; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

6.  Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Duepree; Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  G Crosthwaite; T Chung; P Dunkley; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Early experience with laparoscopic approach for solid liver tumors: initial 16 cases.

Authors:  B Descottes; F Lachachi; M Sodji; D Valleix; S Durand-Fontanier; B Pech de Laclause; D Grousseau
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Safety zones for anterior abdominal wall entry during laparoscopy: a CT scan mapping of epigastric vessels.

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Ali M Meslemani; Robert Davis; Ronald Pimentel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Preoperative liver registration for augmented monocular laparoscopy using backward-forward biomechanical simulation.

Authors:  Erol Özgür; Bongjin Koo; Bertrand Le Roy; Emmanuel Buc; Adrien Bartoli
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Patient-Specific Simulation of Pneumoperitoneum for Laparoscopic Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Shivali Dawda; Mafalda Camara; Philip Pratt; Justin Vale; Ara Darzi; Erik Mayer
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.460

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.