Literature DB >> 18096149

Phonotactic probability influences speech production.

Matthew Goldrick1, Meredith Larson.   

Abstract

Speakers are faster and more accurate at processing certain sound sequences within their language. Does this reflect the fact that these sequences are frequent or that they are phonetically less complex (e.g., easier to articulate)? It has been difficult to contrast these two factors given their high correlation in natural languages. In this study, participants were exposed to novel phonotactic constraints de-correlating complexity and frequency by subjecting the same phonological structure to varying degrees of probabilistic constraint. Participants' behavior was sensitive to variations in frequency, demonstrating that phonotactic probability influences speech production independent of phonetic complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18096149     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  22 in total

1.  Bilinguals' twisted tongues: Frequency lag or interference?

Authors:  Chuchu Li; Matthew Goldrick; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

2.  Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.

Authors:  Audrey K Kittredge; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  The Frame Constraint on Experimentally Elicited Speech Errors in Japanese.

Authors:  Akie Saito; Tomoyoshi Inoue
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-06

4.  New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.

Authors:  Kyle E Chambers; Kristine H Onishi; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Novel phonotactic learning: Tracking syllable-position and co-occurrence constraints.

Authors:  Amélie Bernard
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in speech and digital sequence production.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Anderson; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Inferior frontal sensitivity to common speech sounds is amplified by increasing word intelligibility.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Noam I Keren; Kelly C Harris; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Ye Xu; Gary S Dell; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-04-26

10.  Neural systems for reading aloud: a multiparametric approach.

Authors:  William W Graves; Rutvik Desai; Colin Humphries; Mark S Seidenberg; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.