Literature DB >> 21925521

Inferior frontal sensitivity to common speech sounds is amplified by increasing word intelligibility.

Kenneth I Vaden1, Stefanie E Kuchinsky, Noam I Keren, Kelly C Harris, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Judy R Dubno, Mark A Eckert.   

Abstract

The left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) exhibits increased responsiveness when people listen to words composed of speech sounds that frequently co-occur in the English language (Vaden, Piquado, & Hickok, 2011), termed high phonotactic frequency (Vitevitch & Luce, 1998). The current experiment aimed to further characterize the relation of phonotactic frequency to LIFG activity by manipulating word intelligibility in participants of varying age. Thirty six native English speakers, 19-79 years old (mean=50.5, sd=21.0) indicated with a button press whether they recognized 120 binaurally presented consonant-vowel-consonant words during a sparse sampling fMRI experiment (TR=8 s). Word intelligibility was manipulated by low-pass filtering (cutoff frequencies of 400 Hz, 1000 Hz, 1600 Hz, and 3150 Hz). Group analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between phonotactic frequency and LIFG activity, which was unaffected by age and hearing thresholds. A region of interest analysis revealed that the relation between phonotactic frequency and LIFG activity was significantly strengthened for the most intelligible words (low-pass cutoff at 3150 Hz). These results suggest that the responsiveness of the left inferior frontal cortex to phonotactic frequency reflects the downstream impact of word recognition rather than support of word recognition, at least when there are no speech production demands. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21925521      PMCID: PMC3207245          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  89 in total

1.  An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system.

Authors:  D E Callan; R D Kent; F H Guenther; H K Vorperian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Stephen M Wilson; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Frederic Dick; Martin I Sereno; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

4.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation.

Authors:  N F Dronkers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

8.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?

Authors:  W J Levelt; L Wheeldon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun

9.  Analysis of lesions by MRI in stroke patients with acoustic-phonetic processing deficits.

Authors:  D Caplan; D Gow; N Makris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Modulation of frontal lobe speech areas associated with the production and perception of speech movements.

Authors:  Julius Fridriksson; Dana Moser; Jack Ryalls; Leonardo Bonilha; Chris Rorden; Gordon Baylis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  3 in total

1.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Phonotactic processing deficit following left-hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Maryam Ghaleh; Laura M Skipper-Kallal; Shihui Xing; Elizabeth Lacey; Iain DeWitt; Andrew DeMarco; Peter Turkeltaub
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Behavioral and Neurodynamic Effects of Word Learning on Phonotactic Repair.

Authors:  David W Gow; Adriana Schoenhaut; Enes Avcu; Seppo P Ahlfors
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.