Literature DB >> 18087950

A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory.

Laura Mickes1, John T Wixted, Peter E Wais.   

Abstract

Analyses of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) almost invariably suggest that, on a recognition memory test, the standard deviation of memory strengths associated with the lures (sigma(lure)) is smaller than that of the targets (sigma(target)). Often, sigma(lure)/ sigma(target) approximately = 0.80. However, that conclusion is based on a model that assumes that the memory strength distributions are Gaussian in form. In two experiments, we investigated this issue in a more direct way by asking subjects to simply rate the memory strengths of targets and lures using a 20-point or a 99-point strength scale. The results showed that the standard deviation of the ratings made to the targets (S(target)) was, indeed, larger than the standard deviation of the ratings made to the lures (S(lure)). Moreover, across subjects, the ratio S(lure)/ S(target) correlated highly with the estimate of sigma(lure)/ sigma(target) obtained from ROC analysis, and both estimates were, on average, approximately equal to 0.80.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18087950     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  3 in total

1.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; C F Sheu; S D Gronlund
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

3.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

  3 in total
  42 in total

1.  Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Relating memory to functional performance in normal aging to dementia using hierarchical Bayesian cognitive processing models.

Authors:  William R Shankle; James P Pooley; Mark Steyvers; Junko Hara; Tushar Mangrola; Barry Reisberg; Michael D Lee
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Using ecphoric confidence ratings to discriminate seen from unseen faces: the effects of retention interval and distinctiveness.

Authors:  James D Sauer; Nathan Weber; Neil Brewer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  Recognition confidence under violated and confirmed memory expectations.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-10-03

5.  The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

6.  Recognition without awareness: an elusive phenomenon.

Authors:  Annette Jeneson; C Brock Kirwan; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Latent mnemonic strengths are latent: a comment on Mickes, Wixted, and Wais (2007).

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Michael S Pratte; Richard D Morey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

8.  Greater loss of object than spatial mnemonic discrimination in aged adults.

Authors:  Zachariah M Reagh; Huy D Ho; Stephanie L Leal; Jessica A Noche; Amanda Chun; Elizabeth A Murray; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Parallel psychometric and cognitive modeling analyses of the Penn Face Memory Test in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; John A Hansen; Matthew K Nock; Steven Heeringa; Robert J Ursano; Murray B Stein
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  The ROC Toolbox: A toolbox for analyzing receiver-operating characteristics derived from confidence ratings.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Frederick S Barrett; Iain M Harlow; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.