Literature DB >> 22441958

Using ecphoric confidence ratings to discriminate seen from unseen faces: the effects of retention interval and distinctiveness.

James D Sauer1, Nathan Weber, Neil Brewer.   

Abstract

Theories of confidence processing for recognition judgments suggest that confidence indexes the degree of match between a presented stimulus and an image in memory (ecphoric similarity). Recent research has demonstrated that having participants rate their confidence that a face had been previously seen provides an equivalent or a better index of the stimulus's status than does eliciting a simple binary response (Sauer, Brewer, & Weber, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137: 528-547, 2008). Using a face recognition paradigm, we manipulated retention interval and stimulus distinctiveness to directly test the suggestion that confidence indexes ecphoric similarity and to probe the boundary conditions for using confidence ratings to discriminate seen from unseen faces. Consistent with the proposed ecphoric basis for confidence ratings, mean confidence was higher for previously seen than for unseen faces, and conditions conducive to the formation of strong memories improved confidence-based discrimination. In all conditions, after the application of a classification algorithm, confidence ratings provided a more sensitive index of face status (i.e., seen or unseen) than did binary responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441958     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0239-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  The effect of judgment type and confidence scale on confidence-accuracy calibration in face recognition.

Authors:  Nathan Weber; Neil Brewer
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-06

Review 2.  Eyewitness testimony.

Authors:  Gary L Wells; Elizabeth A Olson
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments.

Authors:  Nathan Weber; Neil Brewer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2004-09

4.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Laura Mickes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Tenney; Robert J MacCoun; Barbara A Spellman; Reid Hastie
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

6.  Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.

Authors:  James D Sauer; Neil Brewer; Nathan Weber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-08

Review 7.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence.

Authors:  G Gigerenzer; U Hoffrage; H Kleinbölting
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  What do we know about eyewitness identification?

Authors:  G L Wells
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1993-05

10.  Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.