OBJECTIVE: The psychometric properties of the Penn Face Memory Test (PFMT) were investigated in a large sample (4,236 participants) of U.S. Army Soldiers undergoing computerized neurocognitive testing. Data were drawn from the initial phase of the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS), a large-scale study directed towards identifying risk and resilience factors for suicidal behavior and other stress-related disorders in Army Soldiers. In this paper, we report parallel psychometric and cognitive modeling analyses of the PFMT to determine whether ability estimates derived from the measure are precise and valid indicators of memory in the Army STARRS sample. METHOD: Single-sample cross-validation methodology combined with exploratory factor and multidimensional item response theory techniques were used to explore the latent structure of the PFMT. To help resolve rotational indeterminacy of the exploratory solution, latent constructs were aligned with parameter estimates derived from an unequal-variance signal detection model. RESULTS: Analyses suggest that the PFMT measures two distinct latent constructs, one associated with memory strength and one associated with response bias, and that test scores are generally precise indicators of ability for the majority of Army STARRS participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of the PFMT as a measure of major constructs related to recognition memory and have implications for further cognitive-psychometric model development.
OBJECTIVE: The psychometric properties of the Penn Face Memory Test (PFMT) were investigated in a large sample (4,236 participants) of U.S. Army Soldiers undergoing computerized neurocognitive testing. Data were drawn from the initial phase of the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS), a large-scale study directed towards identifying risk and resilience factors for suicidal behavior and other stress-related disorders in Army Soldiers. In this paper, we report parallel psychometric and cognitive modeling analyses of the PFMT to determine whether ability estimates derived from the measure are precise and valid indicators of memory in the Army STARRS sample. METHOD: Single-sample cross-validation methodology combined with exploratory factor and multidimensional item response theory techniques were used to explore the latent structure of the PFMT. To help resolve rotational indeterminacy of the exploratory solution, latent constructs were aligned with parameter estimates derived from an unequal-variance signal detection model. RESULTS: Analyses suggest that the PFMT measures two distinct latent constructs, one associated with memory strength and one associated with response bias, and that test scores are generally precise indicators of ability for the majority of Army STARRS participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of the PFMT as a measure of major constructs related to recognition memory and have implications for further cognitive-psychometric model development.
Authors: W M Kelley; F M Miezin; K B McDermott; R L Buckner; M E Raichle; N J Cohen; J M Ollinger; E Akbudak; T E Conturo; A Z Snyder; S E Petersen Journal: Neuron Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: R C Gur; J D Ragland; P J Moberg; T H Turner; W B Bilker; C Kohler; S J Siegel; R E Gur Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Virginie M Patt; Victoria B Risbrough; Dewleen G Baker Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Michael L Thomas; Virginie M Patt; Andrew Bismark; Joyce Sprock; Melissa Tarasenko; Gregory A Light; Gregory G Brown Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2017-03-09
Authors: Robert J Ursano; Lisa J Colpe; Steven G Heeringa; Ronald C Kessler; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein Journal: Psychiatry Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.458
Authors: Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Virginie M Patt; Matthew K Nock; James A Naifeh; Steven Heeringa; Robert J Ursano; Murray B Stein Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Tyler M Moore; Ruben C Gur; Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Matthew K Nock; Adam P Savitt; John G Keilp; Steven Heeringa; Robert J Ursano; Murray B Stein Journal: Assessment Date: 2017-01-30
Authors: James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Robert J Ursano; Patti L Vegella; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Ronald C Kessler; Christina L Wryter; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2016-11-01
Authors: Virginie M Patt; Michael L Thomas; Arpi Minassian; Mark A Geyer; Gregory G Brown; William Perry Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Steven G Heeringa; Nancy Gebler; Lisa J Colpe; Carol S Fullerton; Irving Hwang; Ronald C Kessler; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Alan M Zaslavsky; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: J Cobb Scott; Tyler M Moore; Dan J Stein; Adele Pretorius; Zukiswa Zingela; Mohammed Nagdee; Linda Ngqengelele; Megan Campbell; Goodman Sibeko; Mary Claire King; Jon M McClellan; Allison M Port; Chad Jackson; Kosha Ruparel; Ezra S Susser; Ruben C Gur Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 3.424