Literature DB >> 9627427

Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection.

D G Watson1, G W Humphreys.   

Abstract

Recently, the authors presented evidence that new items can be prioritized for selection by the top-down attentional inhibition of old stimuli already in the field (visual marking; D. G. Watson & G. W. Humphreys, 1997). In this article the authors assess whether this inhibition extends to moving old items and test an alternative account of visual marking. Six experiments showed that old moving items could be inhibited provided they did not undergo abrupt property changes. Further, and in contrast to effects with static stimuli, the marking of old moving stimuli was based on inhibition applied at the level of a whole feature map, rather than at their locations. The results also rule out an alternative account of visual marking based on the top-down weighting of dynamic or static processing pathways.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9627427     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?

Authors:  Derrick G Watson; Matthew Inglis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

2.  The impact of Degraded distractors on (Nondegraded) target identification.

Authors:  Ada Kritikos; Alexia Pavlis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual marking and change detection.

Authors:  Jose L Herrero; Ros Crawley; Cees van Leeuwen; Antonino Raffone
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-08-18

4.  Prioritizing new over old: an fMRI study of the preview search task.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Stephen Smith; Paul Matthews; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Objects or Locations in Vision for Action? Evidence from the MILO task.

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008-01-01

6.  Adaptation and visual salience.

Authors:  Kyle C McDermott; Gokhan Malkoc; Jeffrey B Mulligan; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit.

Authors:  Takayuki Osugi; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-24

8.  Perceptual grouping constrains inhibition in time-based visual selection.

Authors:  Zorana Zupan; Derrick G Watson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-29

10.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.