Literature DB >> 18072258

Mammography screening of women in their 40s: impact of changes in screening guidelines.

Lisa Calvocoressi1, Albert Sun, Stanislav V Kasl, Elizabeth B Claus, Beth A Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: : In March 1997, the American Cancer Society (ACS) updated its recommended mammography screening interval for women ages 40-49 years from once every 1 to 2 years to once every year. At the same time, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), which had previously not recommended routine screening of women in their 40s, began recommending screening at 1 to 2-year intervals. These events occurred during the data collection phase of a prospective study of mammography screening and, thereby, provided an unexpected opportunity to examine the potential influences of changing guidelines on women's beliefs about how frequently they should obtain screening exams.
METHODS: : This analysis included 1451 African American and white women ages 40-79 years, who obtained an "index" screening exam between October 1996 and January 1998. In baseline and 2-year follow-up telephone interviews, respondents provided information on demographic, socioeconomic, health history, medical care, behavioral and psychosocial factors, and on how frequently they believed women of their age should obtain screening mammograms.
RESULTS: : After the ACS and NCI announcements of new screening guidelines for women in their 40s, a significant increase in endorsement of annual screening among women ages 40-49 years was observed, consistent with the ACS recommendation for annual screening in that age group. No increase in endorsement of annual screening among women ages 50 years and older was evident during the same time period.
CONCLUSIONS: : Women's beliefs about how frequently they should obtain mammography screenings appear to change in response to changes in recommendations of high-profile health organizations, particularly when those recommendations call for an increase in screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18072258      PMCID: PMC3086941          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  67 in total

1.  Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening.

Authors:  V L Champion
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1992

2.  Prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography among women aged 55-79 in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  William Rakowski; Nancy Breen; Helen Meissner; Barbara K Rimer; Sally W Vernon; Melissa A Clark; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States).

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Amy Dailey; Lisa Calvocoressi; Kam Reams; Stanislav V Kasl; Carol Lee; Helen Hsu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  Benefits and risks of screening mammography for women in their forties: a statistical appraisal.

Authors:  D A Berry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Disparities in adherence to recommended followup on screening mammography: interaction of sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Jadwiga Jodi Strzelczyk; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.847

6.  A comparative study of re-attenders and non-re-attenders for second triennial National Breast Screening Programme appointments.

Authors:  G Marshall
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1994-03

7.  Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.

Authors:  S Halabi; C S Skinner; G P Samsa; T S Strigo; Y S Crawford; B K Rimer
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Screening mammography for women in their forties.

Authors:  D A Berry
Journal:  Breast Dis       Date:  1998-08

9.  The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences.

Authors:  James Michaelson; Sameer Satija; Richard Moore; Griffin Weber; Elkan Halpern; Andrew Garland; Dhruv Puri; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Emily White; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Berta M Geller; Robert D Rosenberg; Karla Kerlikowske; Laura Saba; Pamela M Vacek; Patricia A Carney; Diana S M Buist; Nina Oestreicher; William Barlow; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  12 in total

1.  The demographic, system, and psychosocial origins of mammographic screening disparities: prediction of initiation versus maintenance screening among immigrant and non-immigrant women.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-08

2.  Cancer perceptions: implications from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Marc A Kowalkowski; Stacey L Hart; Xianglin L Du; Sarah Baraniuk; David M Latini
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Mammography decision making: Trends and predictors of provider communication in the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2011 to 2014.

Authors:  Laura M Spring; Megan R Marshall; Erica T Warner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Mammography rates after the 2009 revision to the United States Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation.

Authors:  Xuanzi Qin; Florence K L Tangka; Gery P Guy; David H Howard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Prolactin enhances insulin-like growth factor I receptor phosphorylation by decreasing its association with the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Kristopher C Carver; Timothy M Piazza; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Implications of the cancer stem-cell hypothesis for breast cancer prevention and therapy.

Authors:  Madhuri Kakarala; Max S Wicha
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Relationships of Family History-related Factors and Causal Beliefs to Cancer Risk Perception and Mammography Screening Adherence Among Medically Underserved Women.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2020-07-16

8.  Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara K Rimer; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Impact of mailed and automated telephone reminders on receipt of repeat mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Barbara K Rimer; Jennifer M Gierisch; J Michael Bowling; David Farrell; Celette S Skinner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: a multi-level analysis.

Authors:  Stephen C Meersman; Nancy Breen; Linda W Pickle; Helen I Meissner; Paul Simon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.