Literature DB >> 11132060

Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.

S Halabi1, C S Skinner, G P Samsa, T S Strigo, Y S Crawford, B K Rimer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Even organizations with differing mammography recommendations agree that regular repeat screening is required for mortality reduction. However, most studies have focused on one-time screening rather than repeat adherence. We compare trends in beliefs and health-related behaviors among women screened and adherent to the National Cancer Institute's screening mammography recommendations (on schedule), those screened at least once and nonadherent (off schedule), and those never screened.
METHODS: Our data are from a baseline telephone interview conducted among 1,287 female members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina who were aged either 40 to 44 years or 50 to 54 years.
RESULTS: The 3 groups differed significantly on beliefs and health-related behaviors, with the off-schedule group almost consistently falling between the on-schedule and never screened groups. Off-schedule women were more likely than on-schedule women, but less likely than those never screened, to not have a clinical breast examination within 12 months, to be ambivalent about screening mammography, to be confused about screening guidelines, and to not be advised by a physician to get a mammogram in the past 2 years. Off-schedule women perceived their breast cancer risk as lower and were less likely to be up to date with other cancer screening tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that women who are off schedule are in need of mammography-promoting interventions, including recommendations from and discussion with their health care providers. Because they are more positive and knowledgeable about mammography than women who have never been screened, they may benefit from brief interventions from health care providers that highlight the importance of repeat screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11132060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  23 in total

1.  Approaches to breast cancer screening among primary care physicians in rural areas of crete, Greece.

Authors:  Maria Trigoni; Martin C Mahoney; Joanna Moschandreas; Dimitris Tsiftsis; Eygenios Koumantakis; Christos Lionis
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  It's the amount of thought that counts: when ambivalence contributes to mammography screening delay.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer M Gierisch; Barbara K Rimer; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-11-03

3.  Influence of perceived breast cancer risk on screening behaviors of female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Li Rita Zhang; Anna M Chiarelli; Gord Glendon; Lucia Mirea; Sarah Edwards; Julia A Knight; Irene L Andrulis; Paul Ritvo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  The effects of gender and age on health related behaviors.

Authors:  Amanda Deeks; Catherine Lombard; Janet Michelmore; Helena Teede
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Mammography screening of women in their 40s: impact of changes in screening guidelines.

Authors:  Lisa Calvocoressi; Albert Sun; Stanislav V Kasl; Elizabeth B Claus; Beth A Jones
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Competitive testing of health behavior theories: how do benefits, barriers, subjective norm, and intention influence mammography behavior?

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Sally W Vernon; Pamela M Diamond; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-02

7.  'If I feel something wrong, then I will get a mammogram': understanding barriers and facilitators for mammography screening among Chilean women.

Authors:  Klaus Püschel; Beti Thompson; Gloria Coronado; Karla Gonzalez; Carolina Rain; Soledad Rivera
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Suzanne C O'Neill; Barbara K Rimer; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Prospective study of factors predicting adherence to surveillance mammography in women treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Shelby; Cindy D Scipio; Tamara J Somers; Mary Scott Soo; Kevin P Weinfurt; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Impact of mailed and automated telephone reminders on receipt of repeat mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Barbara K Rimer; Jennifer M Gierisch; J Michael Bowling; David Farrell; Celette S Skinner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.