Literature DB >> 15207980

Prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography among women aged 55-79 in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

William Rakowski1, Nancy Breen, Helen Meissner, Barbara K Rimer, Sally W Vernon, Melissa A Clark, Andrew N Freedman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Utilization of mammography has increased steadily since the early 1990s. It is now important to expand the attention given to obtaining repeat examination. This study examines the prevalence and cross-sectional correlates of repeat mammography, among women aged 55-79, using a 12-month (N = 3,502) and a 24-month interval (N = 3,491).
METHODS: Data were from the Year 2000 Cancer Control Module of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS-CCM). The NHIS-CCM asked about the most recent mammogram and the total number of mammograms over the prior 6 years. An algorithm estimated repeat mammography for the two intervals.
RESULTS: Prevalence estimates were 49% for the 12-month interval, and 64.1% for the 24-month interval. Correlates of lower likelihood of repeat mammography for both indicators were: no regular source of care, having public or no health insurance, less than a college education, household income less than $45K, not being married, current or never smoking, age 65-79, and lower absolute risk of breast cancer (Gail Model score).
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of women do not receive repeat mammography. The correlates of repeat mammography were similar to those often found for ever-had and recent mammography. There is probably some imprecision in the prevalence estimates due to the nature of NHIS-CCM questions. Issues pertinent to the definition of repeat examination are addressed. Copyright 2004 The Institute for Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15207980     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  32 in total

1.  Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Kathleen Holmes; Kassandra Alcaraz; Bindu Kalesan; Suchitra Rath; Melissa Richert; Amy McQueen; Nikki Caito; Lou Robinson; Eddie M Clark
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-10

2.  The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  C P Gross; G Filardo; H S Singh; A N Freedman; M H Farrell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Does gender discrimination impact regular mammography screening? Findings from the race differences in screening mammography study.

Authors:  Amy B Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Beth A Jones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Bias associated with self-report of prior screening mammography.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Binbing Yu; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Tracy Onega; Eric J Feuer; Nancy Breen; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  The demographic, system, and psychosocial origins of mammographic screening disparities: prediction of initiation versus maintenance screening among immigrant and non-immigrant women.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-08

7.  Enhancing screening and early detection among women transitioning to Medicare from the NBCCEDP in Georgia.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; A Rana Bayakly; Alissa K Berzen; Sarah Blake; Peter Joski; Chunyu Li; Ingrid J Hall; Susan A Sabatino
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Continuum of mammography use among US women: classification tree analysis.

Authors:  Annie Gjelsvik; Michelle L Rogers; Melissa A Clark; Hernando C Ombao; William Rakowski
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2014-07

9.  Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).

Authors:  Maria O Celaya; Ethan M Berke; Tracy L Onega; Jiang Gui; Bruce L Riddle; Sai S Cherala; Judy R Rees
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 1.759

10.  Using small-area estimation to describe county-level disparities in mammography.

Authors:  Karen L Schneider; Kate L Lapane; Melissa A Clark; William Rakowski
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.