BACKGROUND: Reports on the dose response to vitamin D are conflicting, and most data were derived from white men and women. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the response of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] to oral vitamin D(3) supplementation in an African American population. DESIGN:Healthy black postmenopausal women (n = 208) participated in avitamin D(3) supplementation trial for a period of 3 y. Analyses were done in the vitamin D supplementation arm (n = 104) to quantify the response in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations at a steady state vitamin D input. The participants received 20 microg/d (800 IU) oral vitamin D(3) for the initial 2 y and 50 microg/d (2000 IU) for the third year. RESULTS: Supplementation with 20 microg/d (800 IU/d) vitamin D(3) raised the mean serum 25(OH)D concentration from a baseline of 46.9 +/- 20.6 nmol/L to 71.4 +/- 21.5 nmol/L at 3 mo. The mean (+/-SD) concentration of serum 25(OH)D was 87.3 +/- 27.0 nmol/L 3 mo after supplementation increased to 50 microg/d (2000 IU/d). All participants achieved a serum 25(OH)D concentration >35 nmol/L, 95% achieved a concentration >50 nmol/L, but only 60% achieved a concentration >75 nmol/L. All patients had concentrations <153 nmol/L. On the basis of our findings, an algorithm for prescribing vitamin D so that patients reach optimal serum concentrations was developed. The algorithm suggests a dose of 70 microg (2800 IU/d) for those with a concentration >45 nmol/L and a dose of 100 microg (4000 IU/d) for those with a concentration <45 nmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with 50 microg/d (2000 IU/d) oral vitamin D(3) is sufficient to raise serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations to >50 nmol/L in almost all postmenopausal African American women. However, higher doses were needed to achieve concentrations >75 nmol/L in many women in this population.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Reports on the dose response to vitamin D are conflicting, and most data were derived from white men and women. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the response of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] to oral vitamin D(3) supplementation in an African American population. DESIGN: Healthy black postmenopausal women (n = 208) participated in a vitamin D(3) supplementation trial for a period of 3 y. Analyses were done in the vitamin D supplementation arm (n = 104) to quantify the response in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations at a steady state vitamin D input. The participants received 20 microg/d (800 IU) oral vitamin D(3) for the initial 2 y and 50 microg/d (2000 IU) for the third year. RESULTS: Supplementation with 20 microg/d (800 IU/d) vitamin D(3) raised the mean serum 25(OH)D concentration from a baseline of 46.9 +/- 20.6 nmol/L to 71.4 +/- 21.5 nmol/L at 3 mo. The mean (+/-SD) concentration of serum 25(OH)D was 87.3 +/- 27.0 nmol/L 3 mo after supplementation increased to 50 microg/d (2000 IU/d). All participants achieved a serum 25(OH)D concentration >35 nmol/L, 95% achieved a concentration >50 nmol/L, but only 60% achieved a concentration >75 nmol/L. All patients had concentrations <153 nmol/L. On the basis of our findings, an algorithm for prescribing vitamin D so that patients reach optimal serum concentrations was developed. The algorithm suggests a dose of 70 microg (2800 IU/d) for those with a concentration >45 nmol/L and a dose of 100 microg (4000 IU/d) for those with a concentration <45 nmol/L. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with 50 microg/d (2000 IU/d) oral vitamin D(3) is sufficient to raise serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations to >50 nmol/L in almost all postmenopausal African American women. However, higher doses were needed to achieve concentrations >75 nmol/L in many women in this population.
Authors: Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Edward Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Thomas Dietrich; Bess Dawson-Hughes Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Robert P Heaney; K Michael Davies; Tai C Chen; Michael F Holick; M Janet Barger-Lux Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Heike A Bischoff; Hannes B Stähelin; Walter Dick; Regula Akos; Margrith Knecht; Christian Salis; Matthias Nebiker; Robert Theiler; Michael Pfeifer; Bettina Begerow; Robert A Lew; Martin Conzelmann Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie; Benjamin Z Leder; Maria P Henao; Chantel M Baldwin; Douglas L Hayden; Joel S Finkelstein Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Michael L Traub; John S Finnell; Anup Bhandiwad; Erica Oberg; Lena Suhaila; Ryan Bradley Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: N Binkley; D Gemar; J Engelke; R Gangnon; R Ramamurthy; D Krueger; M K Drezner Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: H A Bischoff-Ferrari; A Shao; B Dawson-Hughes; J Hathcock; E Giovannucci; W C Willett Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 4.507