BACKGROUND: The cholecalciferol inputs required to achieve or maintain any given serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration are not known, particularly within ranges comparable to the probable physiologic supply of the vitamin. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to establish the quantitative relation between steady state cholecalciferol input and the resulting serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration and to estimate the proportion of the daily requirement during winter that is met by cholecalciferol reserves in body tissue stores. DESIGN:Cholecalciferol was administered daily in controlled oral doses labeled at 0, 25, 125, and 250 micro g cholecalciferol for approximately 20 wk during the winter to 67 men living in Omaha (41.2 degrees N latitude). The time course of serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration was measured at intervals over the course of treatment. RESULTS: From a mean baseline value of 70.3 nmol/L, equilibrium concentrations of serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol changed during the winter months in direct proportion to the dose, with a slope of approximately 0.70 nmol/L for each additional 1 micro g cholecalciferol input. The calculated oral input required to sustain the serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration present before the study (ie, in the autumn) was 12.5 micro g (500 IU)/d, whereas the total amount from all sources (supplement, food, tissue stores) needed to sustain the starting 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration was estimated at approximately 96 micro g (approximately 3800 IU)/d. By difference, the tissue stores provided approximately 78-82 micro g/d. CONCLUSIONS:Healthy men seem to use 3000-5000 IU cholecalciferol/d, apparently meeting > 80% of their winter cholecalciferol need with cutaneously synthesized accumulations from solar sources during the preceding summer months. Current recommended vitamin D inputs are inadequate to maintain serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration in the absence of substantial cutaneous production of vitamin D.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The cholecalciferol inputs required to achieve or maintain any given serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration are not known, particularly within ranges comparable to the probable physiologic supply of the vitamin. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to establish the quantitative relation between steady state cholecalciferol input and the resulting serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration and to estimate the proportion of the daily requirement during winter that is met by cholecalciferol reserves in body tissue stores. DESIGN:Cholecalciferol was administered daily in controlled oral doses labeled at 0, 25, 125, and 250 micro g cholecalciferol for approximately 20 wk during the winter to 67 men living in Omaha (41.2 degrees N latitude). The time course of serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration was measured at intervals over the course of treatment. RESULTS: From a mean baseline value of 70.3 nmol/L, equilibrium concentrations of serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol changed during the winter months in direct proportion to the dose, with a slope of approximately 0.70 nmol/L for each additional 1 micro g cholecalciferol input. The calculated oral input required to sustain the serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration present before the study (ie, in the autumn) was 12.5 micro g (500 IU)/d, whereas the total amount from all sources (supplement, food, tissue stores) needed to sustain the starting 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration was estimated at approximately 96 micro g (approximately 3800 IU)/d. By difference, the tissue stores provided approximately 78-82 micro g/d. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy men seem to use 3000-5000 IU cholecalciferol/d, apparently meeting > 80% of their winter cholecalciferol need with cutaneously synthesized accumulations from solar sources during the preceding summer months. Current recommended vitamin D inputs are inadequate to maintain serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration in the absence of substantial cutaneous production of vitamin D.
Authors: John M Brehm; Brooke Schuemann; Anne L Fuhlbrigge; Bruce W Hollis; Robert C Strunk; Robert S Zeiger; Scott T Weiss; Augusto A Litonjua Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Micah L Olson; Naim M Maalouf; Jon D Oden; Perrin C White; Michele R Hutchison Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: John F Payne; Robin Ray; David G Watson; Cecile Delille; Eva Rimler; Julia Cleveland; Michael J Lynn; Vin Tangpricha; Sunil K Srivastava Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: E M Stein; M T Yin; D J McMahon; A Shu; C A Zhang; D C Ferris; I Colon; J F Dobkin; S M Hammer; E Shane Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Anthony M Belenchia; Sarah A Johnson; Alyssa C Kieschnick; Cheryl S Rosenfeld; Catherine A Peterson Journal: Comp Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: John M Brehm; Juan C Celedón; Manuel E Soto-Quiros; Lydiana Avila; Gary M Hunninghake; Erick Forno; Daniel Laskey; Jody S Sylvia; Bruce W Hollis; Scott T Weiss; Augusto A Litonjua Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 21.405