Literature DB >> 11157326

Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 intake exceeding the lowest observed adverse effect level.

R Vieth1, P C Chan, G D MacFarlane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences states that 95 microg vitamin D/d is the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL).
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of prolonged vitamin D3 intakes of 25 and 100 microg (1000 and 4000 IU)/d. Efficacy was based on the lowest serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration achieved by subjects taking vitamin D3; potential toxicity was monitored by measuring serum calcium concentrations and by calculating urinary calcium-creatinine ratios.
DESIGN: Healthy men and women (n = 61) aged 41 +/- 9 y (mean +/- SD) were randomly assigned to receive either 25 or 100 microg vitamin D3/d for 2-5 mo, starting between January and February. Serum 25(OH)D was measured by radioimmunoassay.
RESULTS: Baseline serum 25(OH)D was 40.7 +/- 15.4 nmol/L (mean +/- SD). From 3 mo on, serum 25(OH)D plateaued at 68.7 +/- 16.9 nmol/L in the 25-microg/d group and at 96.4 +/- 14.6 nmol/L in the 100-microg/d group. Summertime serum 25(OH)D concentrations in 25 comparable subjects not taking vitamin D3 were 46.7 +/- 17.8 nmol/L. The minimum and maximum plateau serum 25(OH)D concentrations in subjects taking 25 and 100 microg vitamin D3/d were 40 and 100 nmol/L and 69 and 125 nmol/L, respectively. Serum calcium and urinary calcium excretion did not change significantly at either dosage during the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The 100-microg/d dosage of vitamin D3 effectively increased 25(OH)D to high-normal concentrations in practically all adults and serum 25(OH)D remained within the physiologic range; therefore, we consider 100 microg vitamin D3/d to be a safe intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11157326     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  157 in total

Review 1.  Clinical nutrition: 6. Management of nutritional problems of patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Khursheed N Jeejeebhoy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Vitamin D insufficiency: no recommended dietary allowance exists for this nutrient.

Authors:  Reinhold Vieth; Donald Fraser
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  In a population study, can parathyroid hormone aid the definition of adequate vitamin D status? A study of people aged 65 years and over from the British National Diet and Nutrition Survey.

Authors:  C J Bates; G D Carter; G D Mishra; D O'Shea; J Jones; A Prentice
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 treatment shrinks uterine leiomyoma tumors in the Eker rat model.

Authors:  Sunil K Halder; Chakradhari Sharan; Ayman Al-Hendy
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Biomarker Modulation Study of Vitamin D Supplementation in Premenopausal Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer (SWOG S0812).

Authors:  Katherine D Crew; Garnet L Anderson; Dawn L Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Parisa Tehranifar; Danika L Lew; Monica Yee; Eric A Brown; Sebastien S Kairouz; Nafisa Kuwajerwala; Therese Bevers; John E Doster; Corrine Zarwan; Laura Kruper; Lori M Minasian; Leslie Ford; Banu Arun; Marian Neuhouser; Gary E Goodman; Powel H Brown
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-05-28

6.  Evaluation and treatment of osetoporotic distal radius fracture in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Eric M Padegimas; Daniel A Osei
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

Review 7.  Not enough vitamin D: health consequences for Canadians.

Authors:  Gerry Schwalfenberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  The effect of monthly 50,000 IU or 100,000 IU vitamin D supplements on vitamin D status in premenopausal Middle Eastern women living in Auckland.

Authors:  H Mazahery; W Stonehouse; P R von Hurst
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Implications of maternal vitamin D deficiency for the fetus, the neonate and the young infant.

Authors:  Nicola Principi; Sonia Bianchini; Elena Baggi; Susanna Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 10.  Benefit-risk assessment of vitamin D supplementation.

Authors:  H A Bischoff-Ferrari; A Shao; B Dawson-Hughes; J Hathcock; E Giovannucci; W C Willett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.