Literature DB >> 24684456

Impact of vitamin D3 dietary supplement matrix on clinical response.

Michael L Traub1, John S Finnell, Anup Bhandiwad, Erica Oberg, Lena Suhaila, Ryan Bradley.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: As a result of research suggesting increased health risk with low serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25(OH)D), health care providers are measuring it frequently. Providers and patients are faced with treatment choices when low status is identified.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of three vitamin D3 dietary supplements with different delivery matrices. SETTING AND
DESIGN: A 12-week, parallel group, single-masked, clinical trial was conducted in Seattle, Washington and Kailua Kona, Hawaii. Sixty-six healthy adults with (25(OH)D) <33 ng/mL were randomly assigned to take one of three D3 supplements, ie, a chewable tablet (TAB), an oil-emulsified drop (DROP), or an encapsulated powder (CAP) at a label-claimed dose of 10,000 IU/day. Actual D3 content was assessed by a third party and the results adjusted based on the actual D3 content administered. Mean change in 25(OH)D/mcg D3 administered; difference in the proportion of D3 insufficient participants (ie, 25(OH)D ≤30 ng/mL) reaching sufficiency (ie, 25(OH)D ≥30 ng/mL); and mean change in serum 1, 25-dihydroxycholecalciferol were measured.
RESULTS: In two of the three products tested, the measured vitamin D3 content varied considerably from the label-claimed dose. Differences in 25(OH)D/mcg D3 administered were significantly different between groups (P = .04; n = 55). Pairwise comparisons demonstrated DROP resulted in a greater increase than TAB (P < .05) but not than CAP. TAB was not different from CAP. The proportions reaching sufficiency were: 100% (TAB and CAP) and 80% (DROP) (P = .03 between groups; n = 55). 1, 25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol did not change significantly in any group.
CONCLUSIONS: Oil-emulsified vitamin D3 supplements resulted in a greater mean change in serum 25(OH)D concentration, but fewer patients reaching vitamin D sufficiency, than chewable or encapsulated supplements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24684456      PMCID: PMC4121030          DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-3162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  40 in total

1.  A comparative study of the relative influence of different anticonvulsant drugs, UV exposure and diet on vitamin D and calcium metabolism in out-patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  H Gough; T Goggin; A Bissessar; M Baker; M Crowley; N Callaghan
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1986-06

2.  Over-the-counter and compounded vitamin D: is potency what we expect?

Authors:  Erin S LeBlanc; Nancy Perrin; Jeffery D Johnson; Annie Ballatore; Teresa Hillier
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 3.  Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety.

Authors:  R Vieth
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Decreased bioavailability of vitamin D in obesity.

Authors:  J Wortsman; L Y Matsuoka; T C Chen; Z Lu; M F Holick
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: a birth-cohort study.

Authors:  E Hyppönen; E Läärä; A Reunanen; M R Järvelin; S M Virtanen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-11-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Efficacy of different doses and time intervals of oral vitamin D supplementation with or without calcium in elderly nursing home residents.

Authors:  V Chel; H A H Wijnhoven; J H Smit; M Ooms; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Human serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with cholecalciferol.

Authors:  Robert P Heaney; K Michael Davies; Tai C Chen; Michael F Holick; M Janet Barger-Lux
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Age-related changes in the 25-hydroxyvitamin D versus parathyroid hormone relationship suggest a different reason why older adults require more vitamin D.

Authors:  Reinhold Vieth; Yasmin Ladak; Paul G Walfish
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Analytical and clinical validation of the 25 OH vitamin D assay for the LIAISON automated analyzer.

Authors:  Diana L Ersfeld; D Sudhaker Rao; Jean-Jacques Body; James L Sackrison; Andrew B Miller; Nayana Parikh; Tar Lisha Eskridge; Amy Polinske; Gregory T Olson; Gordon D MacFarlane
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.281

10.  Serum vitamin D metabolites in colorectal cancer patients receiving cholecalciferol supplementation: correlation with polymorphisms in the vitamin D genes.

Authors:  Josephia R Muindi; Araba A Adjei; Zengru R Wu; Isabel Olson; Huayi Huang; Adrienne Groman; Lili Tian; Prashant K Singh; Lara E Sucheston; Candace S Johnson; Donald L Trump; Marwan G Fakih
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.869

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effects of vitamin D on acute viral respiratory infections: A rapid review.

Authors:  Ryan Bradley; Janet Schloss; Danielle Brown; Deisy Celis; John Finnell; Rita Hedo; Vladyslav Honcharov; Traci Pantuso; Hilda Peña; Romy Lauche; Amie Steel
Journal:  Adv Integr Med       Date:  2020-08-03

2.  Hypovitaminosis D and "small burden" uterine fibroids: Opportunity for a vitamin D supplementation.

Authors:  Andrea Ciavattini; Giovanni Delli Carpini; Matteo Serri; Arianna Vignini; Jacopo Sabbatinelli; Alessandra Tozzi; Alice Aggiusti; Nicolò Clemente
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.