UNLABELLED: Current intake recommendations of 200 to 600 IU vitamin D per day may be insufficient for important disease outcomes reduced by vitamin D. INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the benefit of higher-dose and higher achieved 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels [25(OH)D] versus any associated risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on double-blind randomized control trials (RCTs), eight for falls (n = 2426) and 12 for non-vertebral fractures (n = 42,279), there was a significant dose-response relationship between higher-dose and higher achieved 25(OH)D and greater fall and fracture prevention. Optimal benefits were observed at the highest dose tested to date for 700 to 1000 IU vitamin D per day or mean 25(OH)D between 75 and 110 nmol/l (30-44 ng/ml). Prospective cohort data on cardiovascular health and colorectal cancer prevention suggested increased benefits with the highest categories of 25(OH)D evaluated (median between 75 and 110 nmol/l). In 25 RCTs, mean serum calcium levels were not related to oral vitamin D up to 100,000 IU per day or achieved 25(OH)D up to 643 nmol/l. Mean levels of 75 to 110 nmol/l were reached in most RCTs with 1,800 to 4,000 IU vitamin D per day without risk. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that mean serum 25(OH)D levels of about 75 to 110 nmol/l provide optimal benefits for all investigated endpoints without increasing health risks. These levels can be best obtained with oral doses in the range of 1,800 to 4,000 IU vitamin D per day; further work is needed, including subject and environment factors, to better define the doses that will achieve optimal blood levels in the large majority of the population.
UNLABELLED: Current intake recommendations of 200 to 600 IU vitamin D per day may be insufficient for important disease outcomes reduced by vitamin D. INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the benefit of higher-dose and higher achieved 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels [25(OH)D] versus any associated risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on double-blind randomized control trials (RCTs), eight for falls (n = 2426) and 12 for non-vertebral fractures (n = 42,279), there was a significant dose-response relationship between higher-dose and higher achieved 25(OH)D and greater fall and fracture prevention. Optimal benefits were observed at the highest dose tested to date for 700 to 1000 IU vitamin D per day or mean 25(OH)D between 75 and 110 nmol/l (30-44 ng/ml). Prospective cohort data on cardiovascular health and colorectal cancer prevention suggested increased benefits with the highest categories of 25(OH)D evaluated (median between 75 and 110 nmol/l). In 25 RCTs, mean serum calcium levels were not related to oral vitamin D up to 100,000 IU per day or achieved 25(OH)D up to 643 nmol/l. Mean levels of 75 to 110 nmol/l were reached in most RCTs with 1,800 to 4,000 IU vitamin D per day without risk. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that mean serum 25(OH)D levels of about 75 to 110 nmol/l provide optimal benefits for all investigated endpoints without increasing health risks. These levels can be best obtained with oral doses in the range of 1,800 to 4,000 IU vitamin D per day; further work is needed, including subject and environment factors, to better define the doses that will achieve optimal blood levels in the large majority of the population.
Authors: Edward D Gorham; Cedric F Garland; Frank C Garland; William B Grant; Sharif B Mohr; Martin Lipkin; Harold L Newmark; Edward Giovannucci; Melissa Wei; Michael F Holick Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: A M Grant; A Avenell; M K Campbell; A M McDonald; G S MacLennan; G C McPherson; F H Anderson; C Cooper; R M Francis; C Donaldson; W J Gillespie; C M Robinson; D J Torgerson; W A Wallace Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 May 7-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Armin Zittermann; Sabine Frisch; Heiner K Berthold; Christian Götting; Joachim Kuhn; Knut Kleesiek; Peter Stehle; Heinrich Koertke; Reiner Koerfer Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Shanna Nesby-O'Dell; Kelley S Scanlon; Mary E Cogswell; Cathleen Gillespie; Bruce W Hollis; Anne C Looker; Chris Allen; Cindy Doughertly; Elaine W Gunter; Barbara A Bowman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: H Johansson; A Odén; J Kanis; E McCloskey; M Lorentzon; Ö Ljunggren; M K Karlsson; P M Thorsby; Å Tivesten; E Barrett-Connor; C Ohlsson; D Mellström Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: R Rizzoli; J J Body; A DeCensi; A De Censi; J Y Reginster; P Piscitelli; M L Brandi Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Marco Di Monaco; Carlotta Castiglioni; Fulvia Vallero; Roberto Di Monaco; Rosa Tappero Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Andres E Carrillo; Michael G Flynn; Catherine Pinkston; Melissa M Markofski; Yan Jiang; Shawn S Donkin; Dorothy Teegarden Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: E M Brouwer-Brolsma; H A Bischoff-Ferrari; R Bouillon; E J M Feskens; C J Gallagher; E Hypponen; D J Llewellyn; E Stoecklin; J Dierkes; A K Kies; F J Kok; C Lamberg-Allardt; U Moser; S Pilz; W H Saris; N M van Schoor; P Weber; R Witkamp; A Zittermann; L C P G M de Groot Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 4.507