Literature DB >> 18050356

Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.

Oliver Kessler1, Shantanu Patil, Stephan Wirth, Wirth Stefan, Eckart Mayr, Clifford W Colwell, Darryl D D'Lima.   

Abstract

Hip range of motion after total hip arthroplasty has been shown to be dependent on prosthetic design and component placement. We hypothesized that bony anatomy would significantly affect range of motion. Computer models of a current generation hip arthroplasty design were virtually implanted in a model of pelvis and femur in various orientations ranging from 35 degrees to 55 degrees cup abduction, 0 degrees to 30 degrees cup anteversion, and 0 degrees to 30 degrees femoral anteversion. Four head sizes ranging from 22.2 to 32 mm and two neck sizes ranging from 10-mm and 12-mm diameter were tested. Range of motion was recorded as maximum flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and axial rotation of the femur before any contact between prosthetic components or bone was detected. Bony impingement preceded component impingement in about 44% of all conditions tested, ranging from 66% in adduction to 22% in extension. Range of motion increased as head size increased. However, increasing head size also increased the propensity for bony impingement, which tended to reduce the beneficial effect of increased head size on range of motion. Reducing neck diameter had a greater effect on prosthetic impingement (mean, 3.5 degrees increase in range of motion) compared to bone impingement (mean, 1.9 degrees ). This model allowed for a clinically relevant assessment of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty and may also be used with patient-specific geometry [such as that obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans] for more accurate preoperative planning. (c) 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18050356     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  22 in total

1.  Computer-assisted versus manual alignment in THA: a probabilistic approach to range of motion.

Authors:  Anthony J Petrella; Joshua Q Stowe; Darryl D D'Lima; Paul J Rullkoetter; Peter J Laz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Motion performance and impingement risk of total hip arthroplasty with a simulation module.

Authors:  Hai Zhou; Cheng-tao Wang; Wen-ting Ji; Xiang-sen Zeng; Shu Fang; Dong-mei Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion.

Authors:  Adam Bunn; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  What is the tolerated width of periacetabular osteophytes to avoid impingement in cementless THA?: a three-dimensional simulation study.

Authors:  Jung-Taek Kim; Jusung Lee; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Ye-Yeon Won; Kunwoo Lee; Vikas Khanduja; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Effects of design parameters of total hip components on the impingement angle and determination of the preferred liner skirt shape with an adequate oscillation angle.

Authors:  Hsiao-Che Lin; Wei-Min Chi; Ying-Jui Ho; Jian-Horng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  A cementless hip system with a new surface for osseous integration.

Authors:  Richard Lass; Alexander Kolb; Gobert Skrbensky; Georg Reinisch; Bernd Kubista; Alexander Giurea; Reinhard Windhager; Rainer Kotz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Optimal anterior femoral offset for functional range of motion in total hip arthroplasty--a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirata; Yasuharu Nakashima; Daisuke Hara; Masayuki Kanazawa; Yusuke Kohno; Kensei Yoshimoto; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Takuma Yamasaki; Soutarou Izumi; Susumu Hachisuka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Low femoral antetorsion and total hip arthroplasty: a risk factor.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Soutarou Izumi; Susumu Hachisuka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Ryo Mori; Michio Hamanishi; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.