Literature DB >> 29936580

What is the tolerated width of periacetabular osteophytes to avoid impingement in cementless THA?: a three-dimensional simulation study.

Jung-Taek Kim1, Jusung Lee2, Young-Kyun Lee3, Yong-Chan Ha4, Ye-Yeon Won1, Kunwoo Lee2, Vikas Khanduja5, Kyung-Hoi Koo6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS: Impingement is a risk factor for instability and prosthetic failure following total hip arthroplasty (THA). If the periacetabular osteophytes are not removed at surgery, impingement could occur between the osteophytes and the femoral stem following THA. However, excessive removal of the osteophytes could lead to bleeding from the bone. The aim of our study, therefore, was to locate the site of the impingement and to determine the width of tolerable osteophytes, which does not induce impingement during activities of daily living (ADL), using a three-dimensional simulation.
METHODS: On 35 hip models, virtual THA was performed. The acetabular cups were positioned at 45° abduction and 20° anteversion, and the anteversion of femoral stems was 15°. Circular osteophytes with a 30-mm rim were built around the acetabular cup. Fourteen ADL motions were simulated, and the osteophytes were removed until there was no impingement. A clock face was used to map the location and the width of tolerable osteophytes.
RESULTS: The impingement mainly occurred in antero-superior and posterior portions around the acetabular cup. Only 4.2-6.2-mm osteophytes were tolerable at the antero-superior portion (12-3 o'clock) and 6.3-7.2-mm osteophytes at the posterior portion (8-10 o'clock) following a total hip arthroplasty. In antero-inferior and postero-superior portions, over-20-mm osteophytes did not induce any impingement.
CONCLUSION: Osteophytes in the antero-superior and posterior portion of the acetabulum should be excised during a THA to avoid impingement of the femur-stem construct on the acetabular osteophytes during ADLs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip; Impingement; Osteophyte; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29936580     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-2982-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  11 in total

1.  Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Jeong Joon Yoo; Young-Kyun Lee; Jin Young Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.

Authors:  Oliver Kessler; Shantanu Patil; Stephan Wirth; Wirth Stefan; Eckart Mayr; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aamer Malik; Manish Dastane; Zhinian Wan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  William B Kurtz; Timo M Ecker; William M Reichmann; Stephen B Murphy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anisha B Patel; Rohan R Wagle; Molly M Usrey; Matt T Thompson; Stephen J Incavo; Philip C Noble
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The fate of osteophytes in the superolateral region of the acetabulum after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Degang Yu; Chen Xu; Fengxiang Liu; Huiwu Li; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Preetesh D Patel; Aaron Potts; Mark I Froimson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Computerized virtual surgery demonstrates where acetabular rim osteophytes most reduce range of motion following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastian Rodriguez-Elizalde; Alyssa M Yeager; Bheeshma Ravi; Joseph D Lipman; Eduardo A Salvati; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-07-26

Review 9.  Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G Lecerf; M H Fessy; R Philippot; P Massin; F Giraud; X Flecher; J Girard; P Mertl; E Marchetti; E Stindel
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  Periarticular osteophytes as an appendicular joint stress marker (JSM): analysis in a contemporary Japanese skeletal collection.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Tsurumoto; Kazunobu Saiki; Keishi Okamoto; Takeshi Imamura; Junichiro Maeda; Yoshitaka Manabe; Tetsuaki Wakebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  No linear correlation between pelvic incidence and acetabular orientation: Retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jung-Taek Kim; Quan Hu Shen; Chang-Hoon Jeon; Nam-Su Chung; Seungmin Jeong; Han-Dong Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  A novel efficient and precise technique for removing acetabular osteophytes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: the SH-9Hospital acetabular edge file.

Authors:  Yongyun Chang; Keyu Kong; Yiming Zeng; Degang Yu; Jingwei Zhang; Mengning Yan; Yuanqing Mao; Huiwu Li; Zanjing Zhai
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.