Literature DB >> 18043920

Emergence of the alumina matrix composite in total hip arthroplasty.

B Masson1.   

Abstract

Pure alumina ceramic has been in clinical use in orthopaedics since 1971 and, currently, up to 5 million components have been implanted. Alumina offers advantages like stability, biocompatibility and low wear; however, it has limited strength. Applications are limited by design considerations. Engineers in biomaterials have worked on improving the performance of the material by optimising the manufacturing process. To fulfil surgeons' and patients' increasingly exacting requirements, ceramists have also developed a new ceramic composite, the alumina matrix composite (AMC). This material combines the great principles of the reinforcement of ceramics with its tribological qualities and presents a better mechanical resistance than alumina. The examination of the tribological situation of AMC, especially under the challenging conditions of hydrothermal ageing, shows the aptitude of this material in wear applications. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ceramic ball heads articulating against polyethylene inserts. Since its introduction, more than 65,000 ball heads and 40,000 inserts of AMC have been implanted. With a 6-year follow up, no complication has been reported to the manufacturer. Improved toughness and the excellent wear of AMC makes it a potentially more flexible alternative to the more traditional alumina for hip prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18043920      PMCID: PMC2899046          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0484-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of alumina-on-alumina implants: a review.

Authors:  L Sedel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Ten-year survivorship of cemented ceramic-ceramic total hip prosthesis.

Authors:  R S Nizard; L Sedel; P Christel; A Meunier; M Soudry; J Witvoet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  On the material and the tribology of alumina-alumina couplings for hip joint prostheses.

Authors:  A Walter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Alumina pairing in total hip replacement.

Authors:  R Nizard; L Sedel; D Hannouche; M Hamadouche; P Bizot
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

5.  Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 18.5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; Pierre Boutin; Jacques Daussange; Mark E Bolander; Laurent Sedel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Alumina-on-alumina hip replacement. Results and survivorship in young patients.

Authors:  L Sedel; L Kerboull; P Christel; A Meunier; J Witvoet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-07

7.  Press-fit metal-backed alumina sockets: a minimum 5-year followup study.

Authors:  P Bizot; M Larrouy; J Witvoet; L Sedel; R Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cementless bulk alumina socket: preliminary results at 6 years.

Authors:  M Hamadouche; R S Nizard; A Meunier; P Bizot; L Sedel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Wear degradation of long-term in vivo exposed alumina-on-alumina hip joints: linking nanometer-scale phenomena to macroscopic joint design.

Authors:  Yasuhito Takahashi; Nobuhiko Sugano; Wenliang Zhu; Takashi Nishii; Takashi Sakai; Masaki Takao; Giuseppe Pezzotti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Survival of hard-on-hard bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Siraj A Sayeed; Aaron J Johnson; Thomas P Schmalzried; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA: prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Brian E Seng; Ian C Clarke; Joanne B Adams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Strategies for head and inlay exchange in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Pospischill; Karl Knahr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Fabrication of Sealed Nanostraw Microdevices for Oral Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Cade B Fox; Yuhong Cao; Cameron L Nemeth; Hariharasudhan D Chirra; Rachel W Chevalier; Alexander M Xu; Nicholas A Melosh; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  What Is the Frequency of Fracture of Ceramic Components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017.

Authors:  Geir Hallan; Anne Marie Fenstad; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Third-generation pure alumina and alumina matrix composites in total hip arthroplasty: What is the evidence?

Authors:  Didier Hannouche; Matthieu Zingg; Hermes Miozzari; Remy Nizard; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-01-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.