Literature DB >> 18040045

Does the H index have predictive power?

J E Hirsch1.   

Abstract

Bibliometric measures of individual scientific achievement are of particular interest if they can be used to predict future achievement. Here we report results of an empirical study of the predictive power of the h index compared with other indicators. Our findings indicate that the h index is better than other indicators considered (total citation count, citations per paper, and total paper count) in predicting future scientific achievement. We discuss reasons for the superiority of the h index.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18040045      PMCID: PMC2148266          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707962104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measures for measures.

Authors:  Sune Lehmann; Andrew D Jackson; Benny E Lautrup
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The h index and career assessment by numbers.

Authors:  Clint D Kelly; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?

Authors:  Kuan-Teh Jeang
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 4.602

  4 in total
  116 in total

1.  Urology resident publication output and its relationship to future academic achievement.

Authors:  Glen Yang; Uwais B Zaid; Bradley A Erickson; Sarah D Blaschko; Peter R Carroll; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Anatomy of funded research in science.

Authors:  Athen Ma; Raúl J Mondragón; Vito Latora
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Hans-Dieter Daniel
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Science beyond impact factors.

Authors:  Peter W Swaan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  A study on journal self-citations and intra-citing within the subject category of multidisciplinary sciences.

Authors:  Jong Yong Abdiel Foo
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Universality of citation distributions: toward an objective measure of scientific impact.

Authors:  Filippo Radicchi; Santo Fortunato; Claudio Castellano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index.

Authors:  Jonathan Stallings; Eric Vance; Jiansheng Yang; Michael W Vannier; Jimin Liang; Liaojun Pang; Liang Dai; Ivan Ye; Ge Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Citation analysis of Canadian psycho-oncology and supportive care researchers.

Authors:  Thomas F Hack; Dauna Crooks; James Plohman; Emma Kepron
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  New indices in scholarship assessment.

Authors:  Dennis F Thompson; Erin C Callen; Milap C Nahata
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Association of Compensation From the Surgical and Medical Device Industry to Physicians and Self-declared Conflict of Interest.

Authors:  Kasra Ziai; Alessio Pigazzi; Brian R Smith; Roxana Nouri-Nikbakht; Helene Nepomuceno; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos; Mehraneh D Jafari
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.