Literature DB >> 19247812

A study on journal self-citations and intra-citing within the subject category of multidisciplinary sciences.

Jong Yong Abdiel Foo1.   

Abstract

For academic research outcomes, there is an increasing emphasis on the bibliometric scorings like the journal impact factor and citations when the assessment of the scientific merits of research or researchers is required. Currently, no known study has been conducted to explore the bibliographical trends of the subject category of multidisciplinary sciences as indexed by the annual Journal Citation Reports of the Thomson Scientific. The effect of journal self-citations and intra-citing within a discipline to the bibliometric data computation can be confounding. In this study, six journals were selected from the multidisciplinary sciences subject category where the trend of self-citations and intra-citing were analysed. These journals were chosen as they published more than 450 citable articles in the year 2007 and had available bibliometric data for a 10-year period. The results showed that self-citations rose as much as +23.98% while intra-citing declined up to -5.80% over the observed period. The retrospective impacts and influences of these observations were also discussed in this study.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19247812     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9118-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  17 in total

1.  Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor.

Authors:  A Fassoulaki; A Paraskeva; K Papilas; G Karabinis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  The Impact Factor: time for change.

Authors:  S Bloch; G Walter
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.744

3.  The counting house.

Authors:  David Adam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  How citation analysis can monitor the progress of research in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Giovanni A Fava; Jenny Guidi; Nicoletta Sonino
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 17.659

5.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research.

Authors:  A L Kinney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  How impact factors changed medical publishing--and science.

Authors:  Hannah Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-17

8.  Reaction of Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica on the current trend of impact factor measures.

Authors:  Harm K Schutte; Jan G Svec
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.849

9.  Author self-citation in the diabetes literature.

Authors:  Apoor S Gami; Victor M Montori; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency.

Authors:  Pentti Nieminen; James Carpenter; Gerta Rucker; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.