Literature DB >> 19079129

The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?

Lutz Bornmann1, Hans-Dieter Daniel.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 19079129      PMCID： PMC2613214          DOI： 10.1038/embor.2008.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Index aims for fair ranking of scientists.

Authors:  Philip Ball
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Does the H index have predictive power?

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  [Impact factor and/or Hirsch index?].

Authors:  Tünde Gracza; Istvánné Somoskövi
Journal:  Orv Hetil       Date:  2007-05-06       Impact factor: 0.540

6.  Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship.

Authors:  James A Evans
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Neutralizing the impact factor culture.

Authors:  Abner L Notkins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The misused impact factor.

Authors:  Kai Simons
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Having an impact (factor).

Authors:  Gregory A Petsko
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.069
  10 in total
  61 in total

Review 1.  Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Werner Marx; Armen Yuri Gasparyan; George D Kitas
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Distribution of the h-index in radiation oncology conforms to a variation of power law: implications for assessing academic productivity.

Authors:  Matthew R Quigley; Emma B Holliday; Clifton D Fuller; Mehee Choi; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Measuring the societal impact of research: research is less and less assessed on scientific impact alone--we should aim to quantify the increasingly important contributions of science to society.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index.

Authors:  Jonathan Stallings; Eric Vance; Jiansheng Yang; Michael W Vannier; Jimin Liang; Liaojun Pang; Liang Dai; Ivan Ye; Ge Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Quality and quantity indices in science: use of visualization tools.

Authors:  Beatrix Groneberg-Kloft; David Quarcoo; Cristian Scutaru
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors.

Authors:  Armen Yuri Gasparyan; Lilit Ayvazyan; George D Kitas
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Enhancing the h index for the objective assessment of healthcare researcher performance and impact.

Authors:  Vanash M Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Lutz Bornmann; Rüdiger Mutz; Jonathan Makanjuola; Petros Skapinakis; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Werner Marx
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.