Literature DB >> 19885080

New indices in scholarship assessment.

Dennis F Thompson1, Erin C Callen, Milap C Nahata.   

Abstract

Faculty members' contributions to research and scholarship are measured by a variety of indices. Assessment also has become an integral part of the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's accreditation process for professional programs. This review describes some of the newer indices available for faculty scholarship assessment. Recently described metrics include the h-index, m-quotient, g-index, h(2) index, a-index, m-index, r-index, ar index, and the creativity index. Of the newer scholarship metrics available, the h-index and m-quotient will likely have the most widespread application in the near future. However, there is no substitute for thoughtful peer review by experienced academicians as the primary method of research and scholarship assessment.

Keywords:  assessment; evaluation; literature; research; scholarship

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19885080      PMCID: PMC2769533          DOI: 10.5688/aj7306111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  14 in total

1.  Measuring the quality of editorial peer review.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Elizabeth Wager; Frank Davidoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Publication records among college of pharmacy deans.

Authors:  Dennis F Thompson; Erin C Callen
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  H-index: age and sex make it unreliable.

Authors:  Clint D Kelly; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Number and impact of published scholarly works by pharmacy practice faculty members at accredited US colleges and schools of pharmacy (2001-2003).

Authors:  Craig I Coleman; Lauren S Schlesselman; Eang Lao; C Michael White
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Evaluation, assessment, and outcomes in pharmacy education: the 2007 AACP Institute.

Authors:  George E Mackinnon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Publication metrics and record of pharmacy practice chairs.

Authors:  Dennis F Thompson; Erin C Callen; Milap C Nahata
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Citation frequency and journal impact: valid indicators of scientific quality?

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-06

10.  Publication rates in U.S. schools and colleges of pharmacy, 1976-1992.

Authors:  D F Thompson; L W Segars
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.705

View more
  11 in total

1.  Is there time for student intellectual development and scholarly pursuits?

Authors:  Gayle A Brazeau
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Benchmarking in academic pharmacy departments.

Authors:  John A Bosso; Marie Chisholm-Burns; Jean Nappi; Paul O Gubbins; Leigh Ann Ross
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Evaluation metrics for biostatistical and epidemiological collaborations.

Authors:  Doris McGartland Rubio; Deborah J Del Junco; Rafia Bhore; Christopher J Lindsell; Robert A Oster; Knut M Wittkowski; Leah J Welty; Yi-Ju Li; Dave Demets
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Quantifying published scholarly works of experiential education directors.

Authors:  Jennifer Danielson; Sara McElroy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Bibliometric Analyses of Physical and Occupational Therapy Faculty across Canada Indicate Productivity and Impact of Rehabilitation Research.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Eunice H Fung; Mary Law
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Publication Records and Bibliometric Indices of Pharmacy School Deans.

Authors:  Dennis F Thompson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Pharmaceutical science faculty publication records at research-intensive pharmacy colleges and schools.

Authors:  Dennis F Thompson; Milap C Nahata
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Common errors in manuscripts submitted to medical science journals.

Authors:  Cc Ezeala; In Nweke; Mo Ezeala
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-07

9.  Impact of Achieved Tenure and Promotion on Faculty Research Productivity at a School of Pharmacy.

Authors:  David M Scott; Michael P Kelsch; Daniel L Friesner
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2019-10-31

10.  Assessing the academic achievement of United States orthopaedic departments.

Authors:  Rishi Trikha; Thomas E Olson; Ameen Chaudry; Chad R Ishmael; Cristina Villalpando; Clark J Chen; Kellyn R Hori; Nicholas M Bernthal
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.