Literature DB >> 16701079

The h index and career assessment by numbers.

Clint D Kelly1, Michael D Jennions.   

Abstract

Growing demand to quantify the research output from public funding has tempted funding agencies, promotion committees and employers to treat numerical indices of research output more seriously. So many assessment exercises are now conducted worldwide that traditional peer assessment is threatened. Here, we describe a new citation-based index (Hirsh's h index) and examine several factors that might influence it for ecologists and evolutionary biologists, such as gender, country of residence, subdiscipline and total publication output. We suggest that h is not obviously superior to other indices that rely on citations and publication counts to assess research performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16701079     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  37 in total

1.  Patenting and the gender gap: should women be encouraged to patent more?

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Distribution of the h-index in radiation oncology conforms to a variation of power law: implications for assessing academic productivity.

Authors:  Matthew R Quigley; Emma B Holliday; Clifton D Fuller; Mehee Choi; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Does the H index have predictive power?

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparison of the h index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America.

Authors:  Jeyanthi Kulasegarah; J E Fenton
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Research grants: Conform and be funded.

Authors:  Joshua M Nicholson; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Characterizing scientific production of Italian Oral Surgery professionals through evaluation of bibliometric indices.

Authors:  Stefano Tetè; Vincenzo Luca Zizzari; Alessandro De Carlo; Felice Lorusso; Marta Di Nicola; Adriano Piattelli; Enrico Gherlone; Antonella Polimeni
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-03-31

7.  Academic productivity in surgical oncology: Where is the bar set for those training the next generation?

Authors:  Christopher J LaRocca; Paul Wong; Oliver S Eng; Mustafa Raoof; Susanne G Warner; Laleh G Melstrom
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis.

Authors:  Nils T Hagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Variability in research productivity among Canadian surgical specialties.

Authors:  Henry Wang; Michael W A Chu; Luc Dubois
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations.

Authors:  Chun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.